AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs

Clean-label data poisoning

Craft poisoned training data via gradient matching and generative methods.

41 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Attacks on text and graphs, keyword cluster “poisoning · membership · watermarking”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

12 papers in 2023–24 and 7 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 4.3% to 1.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 2182019: 4192020: 2202021: 5212022: 8222023: 7232024: 5242025: 3252026: 426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

35 papers here report 370 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 50%, no clear effect 8%, hurt 33%, mixed 9%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Increase watermark length from q=100 to q=3000CIFAR-10 (ResNet-18) · AUROC0.5522 -> 1.0000HelpedProvable Watermarking for Data Poisoning Attacks (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Increase NGD update stepsUnlearning experiments · unlearning effectivenessHelpedMachine Unlearning Fails to Remove Data Poisoning Attacks (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Set sharpness radius ρ to 0.01 rather than 0.1CIFAR10 targeted · success rate82.1 -> 76.5HurtSharpness-Aware Data Poisoning Attack (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
amplify poisons with JTT instead of excluding them from the amplified setWaterbirds, DLBD · ASR0.5 ± 0.3 \% -> \mathbf{20.4} ± 5.9 \%HurtLike Oil and Water: Group Robustness Methods and Poisoning Defenses May Be at Odds (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Use second-order rather than first-order optimizationCIFAR-10, 2% poison budget · set size reduction ratio0.46 ± 0.02 -> 0.48 ± 0.02HelpedData Poisoning Attacks against Conformal Prediction (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Filter out the top 10% of denoising-loss valuesCIFAR10, BadNets-1, p=1% · ASR (%)62.38 -> 13.62HelpedFrom Trojan Horses to Castle Walls: Unveiling Bilateral Data Poisoning Effects in Diffusion Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Concept-level selection only (boat2kit)COCO TIR · Hit@100.505 to 0.610HelpedMP-Nav: Enhancing Data Poisoning Attacks against Multimodal Learning (ICML 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 5 of 8 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 3 of 8 papers
  • Tiny-ImageNet · 2 of 8 papers

Baselines

  • Meta-Poison · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 19 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 32 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy