AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs

Graph neural network robustness

Attack and defend graph neural networks against adversarial perturbations.

71 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2018–2026) · an approach in Attacks on text and graphs, keyword cluster “generative · purification · diffusion”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

23 papers in 2023–24 and 31 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.2% to 6.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 1182019: 3192020: 3202021: 7212022: 3222023: 10232024: 13242025: 16252026: 1526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

43 papers here report 408 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 21%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Increase the StoG penalty strength γCIFAR-10 · clean accuracyNo clear effectEnhancing the Robustness of Spiking Neural Networks with Stochastic Gating Mechanisms (AAAI 2024 · 13 citations)
add temporal smoothness to edge filteringWikipedia, T-Spear, p=0.3 · MRR75.3 ± 0.4 -> 76.1 ± 0.3HelpedSpear and Shield: Adversarial Attacks and Defense Methods for Model-Based Link Prediction on Continuous-Time Dynamic Graphs (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
Add semantic-based edge supplementationCora and Citeseer, Mettack 25% · accuracyHelpedRefine then Classify: Robust Graph Neural Networks with Reliable Neighborhood Contrastive Refinement (AAAI 2025 · 4 citations)
increase fractional order βGIA attacks · accuracyHurtCoupling Graph Neural Networks with Fractional Order Continuous Dynamics: A Robustness Study (AAAI 2024 · 4 citations)
Add elite hyperedge selection (R1)Cora, Hyper-KNN · misclassification rate (%)30.80 -> 59.60HelpedHypergraph Attacks via Injecting Homogeneous Nodes into Elite Hyperedges (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
add C&W loss to top-k gradient selectionCIFAR10-DVS · ASR (%)69.0 -> 72.0HelpedTowards Effective and Sparse Adversarial Attack on Spiking Neural Networks via Breaking Invisible Surrogate Gradients (CVPR 2025 · 3 citations)
Use MCP instead of ℓ1 penaltyCora ML adaptive local attack, 200% · accuracy14.0 ± 7.4 -> 69.3 ± 9.0HelpedRobust Graph Neural Networks via Unbiased Aggregation (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Remove the bidirectional update mechanismpolicy reconstruction · attack performance curveHurtEnhancing Robustness of Graph Neural Networks on Social Media with Explainable Inverse Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
use exogenous reliable FTs to produce detectors instead of the standard reliable FTsCora, Citeseer, Pubmed, and Polblogs, p_r=20 · classification accuracy (%)73.49 -> 71.02; 73.84 -> 65.70; 79.51 -> 75.40; 70.76 -> 68.42; 72.42 -> 66.01; 76.91 -> 75.48; 75.10 -> 73.39; 79.30 ->HurtGrimm: A Plug-and-Play Perturbation Rectifier for Graph Neural Networks Defending Against Poisoning Attacks (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Add MS-MPPD loss with ρ=1.0 to DLIF adversarial trainingCIFAR-10 · PGD^10 accuracy26.27 -> 27.34HelpedRobust Stable Spiking Neural Networks (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Use robust training that minimizes detected poisoned nodes' target-class confidence instead of removing identified nodes and training with cross-entropyOGB-arxiv, DPGBA, two trigger edges · ASR(%)HelpedRobustness Inspired Graph Backdoor Defense (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Add total variation fairness loss to the surrogate lossCredit, FairGNN · Δdp (%)7.87 {± 1.31} -> 8.06 {± 1.90}HelpedAdversarial Attacks on Fairness of Graph Neural Networks (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 21 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Cora · 9 of 21 papers
  • Citeseer · 9 of 21 papers
  • Pubmed · 7 of 21 papers
  • Chameleon · 3 of 21 papers
  • Cora-ML · 3 of 21 papers
  • Polblogs · 2 of 21 papers
  • Reddit · 2 of 21 papers
  • DBLP · 2 of 21 papers

Baselines

  • GCN · 4 of 21 papers
  • RGCN · 2 of 21 papers
  • Pro-GNN · 2 of 21 papers
  • Jaccard · 2 of 21 papers
  • GAT · 2 of 21 papers
  • APPNP · 2 of 21 papers
  • GNNGuard · 2 of 21 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 54 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy