atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs

Data Poisoning Attacks against Conformal Prediction

ICML 2024 · Adversarial robustness and security › Attacks on text and graphs · approach: Clean-label data poisoning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a black-box data poisoning attack framework that manipulates conformal prediction set sizes (uncertainty) rather than misclassifications, using closed-form influence-based updates and worst-case model optimization.

Problem

Data poisoning attacks against conformal prediction (CP) uncertainty estimates are unexplored; existing poisoning attacks target misclassification, and existing CP attacks focus on validity rather than efficiency (set size).

Approach

A bi-level poisoning framework that crafts poisons to inflate or shrink CP set sizes for target samples, approximating the discrete set sizes and non-differentiable quantile with surrogate losses, optimizing against the worst-case poisoned model via sharpness-aware perturbation, and using closed-form first- and second-order influence updates to avoid retraining.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the proposed poisoning attack instead of random uniform or Gaussian noiseConformal prediction attacks · CIFAR-10, HPS and RAPS, 2% poison budgetset size reduction ratio: 0.48 with HPS and 0.54 with RAPS; baselines below 0.32Helped
Use the proposed poisoning attack under existing poisoning defensesOverconfidence CP attacks on CIFAR-10 · CIFAR-10, 2% poison budget, HPSset size reduction ratio: 0.46 ± 0.02 -> 0.34 ± 0.05Mixed
Use second-order rather than first-order optimization (ablation)Proposed poisoning attack · CIFAR-10, 2% poison budgetset size reduction ratio: 0.46 ± 0.02 -> 0.48 ± 0.02Helped
Use first-order rather than second-order optimization (ablation)Proposed poisoning attack · CIFAR-10, 2% poison budgetrunning time (min): 369.23 ± 4.81 -> 19.26 ± 0.14Helped
Use worst-case ℓ3 loss rather than ℓ2 loss (ablation)Proposed poisoning attack · CIFAR-10, 0.5% and 1% poison budgetsset size reduction ratio: +0.01 and +0.02Helped
Increase the perturbation bound (ablation)Overconfidence CP attacks · CIFAR-10, 2% poison budgetset size reduction ratioHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 Tiny-ImageNet

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 Tiny-ImageNet

Metrics: set size reduction ratio set size expansion ratio prediction consistency empirical coverage rate running time

Baselines: RandUn RandGa MetaPoison

Builds on: conformal prediction MetaPoison sharpness-aware minimization influence functions

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy