atlas

Research map / 3D vision / NeRF and radiance fields

DyBluRF: Dynamic Neural Radiance Fields from Blurry Monocular Video

CVPR 2024 · 3D vision › NeRF and radiance fields · approach: Sparse-input NeRF regularization · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DyBluRF, a dynamic NeRF that renders sharp novel views from blurry monocular video by jointly modeling camera trajectories, object DCT motion trajectories, cross-time rendering, and extreme-value depth/flow constraints.

Problem

Dynamic NeRF methods assume sharp inputs and degrade badly on monocular videos with motion blur caused by camera and object motion.

Approach

Model the exposure-time image formation explicitly: learn camera poses at discretized exposure timestamps and per-point DCT motion trajectories (learnable basis), render across global time with cross-time rendering, and apply extreme-value constraints (min depth, max flow) on depth and flow priors computed from blurry frames.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use DyBluRF to model blur in 3D rather than a dynamic NeRF baseline on blurry inputsDynamic NeRF novel-view synthesis · Stereo Blur Dataset (6-scene average)PSNR: 23.33 -> 25.66Helped
Use DyBluRF to model blur in 3D rather than a dynamic NeRF baseline on blurry inputsDynamic NeRF novel-view synthesis · Stereo Blur Dataset (6-scene average)SSIM: 0.834 -> 0.895Helped
Use DyBluRF to model blur in 3D rather than a dynamic NeRF baseline on blurry inputsDynamic NeRF novel-view synthesis · Stereo Blur Dataset (6-scene average)LPIPS: 0.181 -> 0.079Helped
Add cross-time rendering (ablation)DyBluRF · Stereo Blur Dataset (6-scene average)PSNR: 24.54 -> 25.66Helped
Use extreme value constraints instead of averaging for data-driven priors (ablation)DyBluRF · Stereo Blur Dataset (6-scene average)PSNR: 25.42 -> 25.66Helped
Add the static model (ablation)DyBluRF · Stereo Blur Dataset (6-scene average)PSNR: 24.67 -> 25.66Helped
Add scene flow constraints (ablation)DyBluRF · Stereo Blur Dataset (6-scene average)PSNR: 24.97 -> 25.66Helped
Learn the DCT basis instead of fixing it to cosine values (ablation)DyBluRF · Stereo Blur Dataset (6-scene average)PSNR: 25.49 -> 25.66Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Stereo Blur Dataset

Benchmarks: Stereo Blur Dataset (6 dynamic scenes subset)

Metrics: PSNR SSIM LPIPS

Baselines: HyperNeRF DVS NSFF RoDynRF Restormer + NSFF Restormer + RoDynRF JCD + NSFF JCD + RoDynRF

Builds on: NeRF BAD-NeRF NSFF RAFT MiDaS

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy