atlas

Research map / Time series / Causal and generative time series

Sequential Modeling of Complex Marine Navigation: Case Study on a Passenger Vessel (Student Abstract)

AAAI 2024 · Time series › Causal and generative time series · approach: Dynamical system reconstruction · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Builds an auto-regressive Informer-plus-GRU time series model that forecasts ferry states (LAT, LON, SOG, FC) from actions and disturbances, and releases an offline RL dataset with a Gym environment for a passenger ferry.

Problem

Reducing vessel fuel consumption by modeling and forecasting ferry states from sensor logs, which prior models handle poorly due to lack of operator input, environmental factors, and temporal structure.

Approach

Combines a pretrained Informer transformer for auto-regressive multi-step forecasting with a GRU module that predicts residuals to curb cumulative auto-regressive error, and packages the two years of ferry data as an offline RL dataset with a three-stage reward curriculum Gym environment.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add GRU refinement to autoregressive forecasting (ablation)Informer forecasting model · Ferry FCRMSE: 0.0777 -> 0.0608Helped
Add GRU refinement to autoregressive forecasting (ablation)Informer forecasting model · Ferry SOGRMSE: 0.0435 -> 0.0304Helped
Add GRU refinement to autoregressive forecasting (ablation)Informer forecasting model · Ferry LATRMSE: 0.0613 -> 0.0385Helped
Add GRU refinement to autoregressive forecasting (ablation)Informer forecasting model · Ferry LONRMSE: 0.0960 -> 0.0604Helped
Use autoregressive forecasting with GRU rather than non-auto-regressive forecasting with GRU (ablation)Informer forecasting model · Ferry FCRMSE: 0.0769 -> 0.0608Helped
Use autoregressive forecasting with GRU rather than non-auto-regressive forecasting with GRU (ablation)Informer forecasting model · Ferry SOGRMSE: 0.0322 -> 0.0304Helped
Use autoregressive forecasting with GRU rather than non-auto-regressive forecasting with GRU (ablation)Informer forecasting model · Ferry LATRMSE: 0.0684 -> 0.0385Helped
Use autoregressive forecasting with GRU rather than non-auto-regressive forecasting with GRU (ablation)Informer forecasting model · Ferry LONRMSE: 0.1097 -> 0.0604Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: two-year ferry operational dataset (minute-level sensor records, west coast Canada)

Benchmarks: ferry operational dataset held-out prediction

Metrics: RMSE standard deviation R^2

Baselines: non-auto-regressive Informer non-auto-regressive Informer + GRU auto-regressive Informer

Builds on: Informer D4RL GRU

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy