AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Variational and generative sampling

Stochastic gradient MCMC

Samples large-scale distributions with stochastic gradient and pseudo-extended samplers.

68 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Variational and generative sampling, keyword cluster “monte · carlo · mcmc”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

11 papers in 2023–24 and 11 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 2.7% to 2.2%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 7172018: 5182019: 10192020: 6202021: 6212022: 8222023: 6232024: 5242025: 6252026: 526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

59 papers here report 539 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 15%, mixed 7%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
change k_Q from K to 10^24-mode Gaussian mixture · MMD2.37e-3 ± 2.29e-3 -> 1.05e-3 ± 8.90e-4HelpedMarkovian Flow Matching: Accelerating MCMC with Continuous Normalizing Flows (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
use sequential training with model transfer instead of random initialization2D Ising, N=64 · training efficiencyHelpedMultilevel Generative Samplers for Investigating Critical Phenomena (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
set power parameter p to 2 instead of 1CartPole-IG · reward76.91 -> 77.85HelpedPower Mean Estimation in Stochastic Continuous Monte-Carlo Tree Search (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
use symmetric thresholds on the absolute log acceptance ratio instead of the asymmetric criterionNormal(0,1), Laplace(0,1), and Cauchy(0,1), across state norms 10^{-5} to 10^2 · acceptance probabilityHelpedAutoStep: Locally adaptive involutive MCMC (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Estimate the Jacobian diagonal stochastically instead of using automatic differentiationGerman Credit Dataset · wall-clock timeover 10\times fasterHelpedParallelizing MCMC Across the Sequence Length (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
use Langevin noise instead of trajectory length randomizationGaussian · gradient calls to squared error < 0.013,249 -> 3,172HelpedMetropolis Adjusted Microcanonical Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Add expanded parameterizationCIFAR-10 test · ERR0.135\PM{0.003} -> 0.115\PM{0.002}HelpedParameter Expanded Stochastic Gradient Markov Chain Monte Carlo (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use BMA meta-loss instead of cross-entropy meta-lossCIFAR-10 · loss barrier between collected parametersHelpedLearning to Explore for Stochastic Gradient MCMC (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Add boundary integral estimationRing, Cardioid, Double-moon, and Block · Wasserstein-2 distance (Sinkhorn)0.2138 -> 0.1087; 0.2321 -> 0.1660; 0.4866 -> 0.1141; 0.2438 -> 0.2416HelpedFunctional Gradient Flows for Constrained Sampling (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Marginalize u2 rather than leave random effects untransformedGrouse ticks · divergent transitions42.60 (25.76) -> 0.00 (0.00)HelpedHamiltonian Monte Carlo Inference of Marginalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 7 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • NUTS · 3 of 7 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 22 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 36 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy