AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Variational and generative sampling

Flow matching and flow sampling

Learns straighter flows and samples from unnormalized densities via flow matching.

144 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in Variational and generative sampling, keyword cluster “diffusion · score · matching”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Leveling off Several papers from 2025–26 still report on 1 tracked benchmark, but the best result has barely moved since 2024.

25 papers in 2023–24 and 113 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 6.0% to 22.6%.

Open questions the data points to

What looks settled

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 1192020: 1202021: 0212022: 4222023: 7232024: 18242025: 32252026: 8126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CIFAR-10 · FID (lower is better)

11 papers, 2022–2025 · flat since 2024

2022: 2.35
20222025
YearBest so farSet by
20222.35Poisson Flow Generative Models (NeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations)

What has been tried

57 papers here report 543 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 71%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 21%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use conditional coupling instead of unconditional couplingConditional text generation · Llama-3 generative perplexity10.3 -> 9.7HelpedDiscrete Flow Matching (NeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations)
Replace ICNN with MLPWasserstein-2 benchmark · convergenceHurtOptimal Flow Matching: Learning Straight Trajectories in Just One Step (NeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations)
add optimal transportBinarized MNIST · FID5.15 -> 4.62HelpedCategorical Flow Matching on Statistical Manifolds (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
Reduce model sizeMolecular generation · Valid-and-unique scoreHelpedVariational Flow Matching for Graph Generation (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
add a learnable diffuse sampler rather than use a pre-defined diffuse samplerTensoSDF synthetic (Average) · PSNR26.433 -> 26.933HelpedTensoFlow: Tensorial Flow-based Sampler for Inverse Rendering (CVPR 2025 · 3 citations)
Add repulsion interaction energyAAV medium · Diversity5.86 -> 6.22HelpedEnergy Matching: Unifying Flow Matching and Energy-Based Models for Generative Modeling (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
add noise to interpolants (σ=0.05)Gaussian mixture d=3 Gen · MMD0.0034 -> 0.0018HelpedGradient Variance Reveals Failure Modes in Flow-Based Generative Models (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
replace exact particle interaction with approximate samplingCIFAR-10 · FID8.31 -> 24.86HurtDeep MMD Gradient Flow without adversarial training (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Reflow (2-RF) versus one-step Rectified Flow (1-RF)seeds, path geometry · discrete kinetic action3179.2 to 3006.9 (lower)HelpedFrom Baselines to Transport Geodesics: Axiomatic Attribution via Optimal Generative Flows (NeurIPS 2026 · 0 citations)
Add embedding and augmentation to MMDSW dataset distillationMNIST and Fashion-MNIST, p=10 · classifier accuracyMNIST: 96.4 ± 0.2 -> 96.4 ± 0.3; FMNIST: 78.0 ± 0.9 -> 78.9 ± 1.2HurtFlowing Datasets with Wasserstein over Wasserstein Gradient Flows (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase KL loss weight from 2e-3 to 5e-3CIFAR-10, higher function evaluations · FID4.430 -> 4.349 (100 NFE); 3.642 -> 3.582 (1000 NFE)HelpedVariational Rectified Flow Matching (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use ΔF-scale losses without state flow regularizationPermutation n=20 · C(k) L10.017 ± 0.002 -> 0.453 ± 0.002HurtRevisiting Non-Acyclic GFlowNets in Discrete Environments (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
DDPMCIFAR-10FID3.17 – 7.483 papers, e.g. ICLR 2025 and ICLR 2023

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 70 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 17 of 70 papers
  • MNIST · 13 of 70 papers
  • CelebA · 5 of 70 papers
  • ImageNet · 4 of 70 papers
  • QM9 · 4 of 70 papers
  • Fashion-MNIST · 3 of 70 papers
  • ImageNet-32 · 3 of 70 papers
  • LSUN Church · 2 of 70 papers

Baselines

  • rectified flow · 5 of 70 papers
  • OT-CFM · 5 of 70 papers
  • DDPM · 5 of 70 papers
  • EDM · 4 of 70 papers
  • Flow Matching · 3 of 70 papers
  • SEDD · 3 of 70 papers
  • FM · 3 of 70 papers
  • Dirichlet FM · 2 of 70 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 138 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 29 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy