AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Variational and generative sampling

Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

Improves Hamiltonian Monte Carlo through reflection, Riemannian geometry and neural parameterization.

89 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Variational and generative sampling, keyword cluster “monte · carlo · mcmc”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

21 papers in 2023–24 and 29 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 5.1% to 5.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 8162017: 5172018: 7182019: 6192020: 4202021: 3212022: 6222023: 7232024: 14242025: 13252026: 1626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

70 papers here report 512 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 68%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 18%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
set noise level σ to 0.1 instead of 0.5paired OAS antibody generation · W_property0.065 -> 0.378HurtProtein Discovery with Discrete Walk-Jump Sampling (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)
Use Thompson sampling instead of optimistic selectionPocman · discounted total reward50.9 ± 0.6 -> 67.38 ± 0.53; 51.0 ± 0.62 -> 75.64 ± 0.51; 52.2 ± 0.79 -> 77.68 ± 0.77; 54.6 ± 1.08 -> 77.70 ± 1.22HelpedMonte-Carlo Tree Search with Uncertainty Propagation via Optimal Transport (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Allocate the full 20M energy-call budget to AIS and train an MLE LearnerManywell-128 · Amortized learning performanceHurtOn scalable and efficient training of diffusion samplers (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Increase LEC network depthIsing model, L=15, J = 0.4, β = 0.7 · ESSHelpedLEAPS: A discrete neural sampler via locally equivariant networks (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add final fine-tuning iterationAlanine dipeptide · NLL-213.666 -> -213.667HelpedTemperature-Annealed Boltzmann Generators (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use exponential-decay rather than identical MCMC-step allocation across SL iterationsCombinatorial optimization benchmarks · objective value or optimality gapMixedSampling from Binary Quadratic Distributions via Stochastic Localization (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add backbone-first permutation4AA · ESS0.051 -> 0.071HelpedAmortized Sampling with Transferable Normalizing Flows (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
add intermediate SMC weighting and resampling to the reverse-diffusion proposalBayesian logistic regression (Credit, Cancer, Ionosphere, Sonar) · Test log-likelihood-606.03 ± 1.26 -> -124.00 ± 1.96; -246.86 ± 0.97 -> -62.23 ± 1.96; -92.62 ± 0.04 -> -87.72 ± 1.7HelpedReverse Diffusion Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Sample all measurements at once (AAO) instead of sequentially with OATElliptical Gaussian · 2-Wasserstein distanceHurtChain of Log-Concave Markov Chains (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Add Metropolis-Hastings initialization instead of initializing at the previous stateUnequally weighted MoG · MMD0.15± 0.01 -> 0.03± 0.01HelpedDiffusive Gibbs Sampling (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
use learning rate η0=0.2 instead of the default η0=0.05NH3 · ground-state energy-56.56366(2) -> -56.56379(1)HelpedQuadratic Quantum Variational Monte Carlo (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 20 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Funnel · 4 of 20 papers
  • Rings · 2 of 20 papers
  • Ionosphere · 2 of 20 papers
  • Sonar · 2 of 20 papers

Baselines

  • RDMC · 3 of 20 papers
  • DMALA · 2 of 20 papers
  • SMC · 2 of 20 papers
  • AIS · 2 of 20 papers
  • SLIPS · 2 of 20 papers
  • PIS · 2 of 20 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 50 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy