AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Dynamical systems

Physics-informed dynamics learning

Learns physical laws using Hamiltonian, Lagrangian and geometric neural dynamics models.

127 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Dynamical systems, keyword cluster “physical · physics · simulation”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

29 papers in 2023–24 and 48 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 12.9% to 12.5%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 1172018: 3182019: 5192020: 11202021: 16212022: 14222023: 10232024: 19242025: 12252026: 3626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

80 papers here report 776 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 19%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add signed distance function feature engineering and use a 64³ gridShapeNet-Car test · MSE ×1002.31 -> 2.24; 2.14MixedUniversal Physics Transformers: A Framework For Efficiently Scaling Neural Operators (NeurIPS 2024 · 23 citations)
use CFA-CON instead of CON-MD-P+F · RMSE0.1323 ± 0.0018 -> 0.1307 ± 0.0012HelpedInput-to-State Stable Coupled Oscillator Networks for Closed-form Model-based Control in Latent Space (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
Learn the Hamiltonian minimum instead of fixing itNoise-free test set, 5% training noise · RMSE1.170 -> 2.420HurtStable Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations)
Add velocity to temporal convolutionN-body · F-MSE0.0057 -> 0.0055HelpedEquivariant Graph Neural Operator for Modeling 3D Dynamics (ICML 2024 · 3 citations)
Replace time composition with a single diffusion model over 44 steps2-body 44 steps · design_obj0.1326 ± 0.0087 -> 0.2779 ± 0.0197HurtCompositional Generative Inverse Design (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
Add the divergence-free conservation-law architecture to GFNONavier–Stokes, T_in=10, T=20; 10, 100, and 1000 training samples · relative L2 error29.56% ± 3.32% -> 12.10% ± 1.08%; 7.59% ± 0.34% -> 4.76% ± 0.24%; 3.11% ± 0.93% -> 1.21% ± 0.09%HelpedHarnessing the Power of Neural Operators with Automatically Encoded Conservation Laws (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Use latent size 4 instead of 32Elastic · reconstruction error1.1e-4 -> 7.8e-4HurtUniPhy: Learning a Unified Constitutive Model for Inverse Physics Simulation (CVPR 2025 · 1 citation)
Use full-unrolling rather than one-step trainingPlume Rise, ϵ = 0.05, p = 6 · discrepancy loss after 3k iterations57.39 -> 6.37; 24.12HelpedLearning Reduced Fluid Dynamics (AAAI 2024 · 1 citation)
apply HMT before CMT instead of contact-then-propagate orderImpact Plate · Position RMSE20.34 -> 42.90HurtLearning Flexible Body Collision Dynamics with Hierarchical Contact Mesh Transformer (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
Add prior reweighting (rather than using γ=1)PO-FC · control error0.01139 -> 0.01103HelpedDiffPhyCon: A Generative Approach to Control Complex Physical Systems (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Add Lagrangian-guided feature evolving (LagToEu)Bounded Navier-Stokes · Relative L20.0556 -> 0.0543HelpedDeepLag: Discovering Deep Lagrangian Dynamics for Intuitive Fluid Prediction (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
set downsampling ratio r¹=2 rather than r¹=82D Navier-Stokes, Re=10^4, 256×256; 50-step rollout · MSE1.606e-01 (6.496e-02) vs 3.774e-01 (1.797e-01)HurtHierarchical Implicit Neural Emulators (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 23 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • UNet · 2 of 23 papers
  • FNO · 2 of 23 papers
  • FFNO · 2 of 23 papers
  • PHNN · 2 of 23 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 77 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy