AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Dynamical systems

Latent models of neural activity

Learns identifiable, behavior-aligned latent models of neural population activity.

70 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Dynamical systems, keyword cluster “brain · activity · neurons”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

20 papers in 2023–24 and 18 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.9% to 4.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 6182019: 5192020: 6202021: 7212022: 7222023: 9232024: 11242025: 12252026: 626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

58 papers here report 500 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 61%, no clear effect 15%, hurt 18%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add automatic AlignPost synapse merging30-area spiking neural network · memory usageHelpedA differentiable brain simulator bridging brain simulation and brain-inspired computing (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)
Add accelerometer inputWildPPG · MAE8.62±0.06 -> 8.22±0.09HelpedWildPPG: A Real-World PPG Dataset of Long Continuous Recordings (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
Increase the smoothing window from w=1 to w=3CMU-CTIS, California, Texas, New York, and Pennsylvania (accum=7) · MAECalifornia: 0.0292 -> 0.0811; Texas: 0.0270 -> 0.0782; New York: 0.0299 -> 0.0886; Pennsylvania: 0.0263 -> 0.0691HurtNowcasting Temporal Trends Using Indirect Surveys (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
Add an L1 penalty to HGSynthetic dataset · LL-5.49 -> 9.14HelpedOne-hot Generalized Linear Model for Switching Brain State Discovery (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
Add both I_thr and s_thr biologically informed embeddingsPVALB test set, HoF train models · relative L2 error (voltage)2.73% -> 1.92% (I_thr alone); 2.83% -> 1.92% (s_thr alone)HelpedNOBLE - Neural Operator with Biologically-informed Latent Embeddings to Capture Experimental Variability in Biological Neuron Models (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Use chirp responses only; omit direction selectivity and soma sizeMouse RGC type classification, test · accuracy79% to 49%HurtMost discriminative stimuli for functional cell type clustering (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
Increase number of discrete states K from 4 to 5 (vs 6) for reachingBehavioral-state variability across conditions · variability of recovered states0.098 (K=5) vs 0.384 (K=4), 0.282 (K=6)HelpedInference of Neural Dynamics Using Switching Recurrent Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Use a diagonal covariance approximation instead of the full covarianceSingle-branch neuron · conductance recoveryHurtIdentifying multi-compartment Hodgkin-Huxley models with high-density extracellular voltage recordings (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Add pre-stimulation state information to the uStim pattern-only response modelMonkey PFC uStim, 6 sessions · post-uStim state prediction performancep<0.05 for all four modelsHelpedOMiSO: Adaptive optimization of state-dependent brain stimulation to shape neural population states (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Predict latent feature vectors from cortical positions instead of freely learning themSENSORIUM mice 1–5, conditioned on half of neurons · Log-likelihood-0.34 -> -0.69HurtModeling Dynamic Neural Activity by combining Naturalistic Video Stimuli and Stimulus-independent Latent Factors (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Silence the kick-neuronsTwo-state HMM · state transitionsHurtMechanistic Interpretability of RNNs emulating Hidden Markov Models (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Add negative samples to the contrastive lossNatural scenes, Mouse 1 · decoding score (%)21.85\(±\)1.86 -> 50.86\(±\)0.81HelpedTime-Evolving Dynamical System for Learning Latent Representations of Mouse Visual Neural Activity (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 14 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • CEBRA · 3 of 14 papers
  • LSTM · 2 of 14 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 38 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy