atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Dynamical systems

Universal Physics Transformers: A Framework For Efficiently Scaling Neural Operators

NeurIPS 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Dynamical systems · approach: Physics-informed dynamics learning · 23 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Universal Physics Transformers (UPTs), a unified neural operator that encodes meshes or particles into a fixed-size latent space, rolls dynamics forward in latent space via inverse encoding/decoding losses, and decodes at arbitrary query points.

Problem

Neural operator surrogates for PDEs scale poorly to large meshes/particle sets, and architectures differ across Eulerian (grid) and Lagrangian (particle) simulations, preventing a unified approach.

Approach

Compress inputs from any grid or particle set into a fixed-size latent token set via a hierarchical encoder (message passing to supernodes, transformer, perceiver pooling), propagate dynamics purely in latent space with a transformer approximator trained with inverse encoding and decoding reconstruction losses, and decode with a perceiver-style cross-attention at arbitrary query points.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use UPT with 64 latent tokens instead of GINO at 48³ resolutionShapeNet-Car pressure prediction · ShapeNet-Car testMSE ×100: 2.58 -> 2.31Helped
Add signed distance function feature engineering and use a 64³ grid (ablation)UPT · ShapeNet-Car testMSE ×100: 2.31 -> 2.24; 2.14Mixed
Replace autoregressive rollout through the physics domain with latent rollout (ablation)UPT-68M · Transient pipe-flow trajectorytime on 1 GPU: 2.0s -> 0.3sHelped
Replace autoregressive rollout through the physics domain with latent rollout (ablation)UPT-68M · Transient pipe-flow trajectoryrollout performanceNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ShapeNet-Car TGV3D (LagrangeBench) TGV2D (LagrangeBench)

Benchmarks: ShapeNet-Car pisoFoam pipe flow transient dataset TGV3D TGV2D

Metrics: test MSE rollout correlation time (Pearson < 0.8) inference time velocity error norm

Baselines: GINO U-Net FNO GNS SEGNN

Builds on: Transformer Neural Operator Geometry-Informed Neural Operator (GINO) Perceiver DiT adaLN modulation Fourier Neural Operator

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy