AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Retrieval and knowledge

Knowledge-augmented question answering

Inject graph or specialized knowledge into LLM prompts and benchmark question answering.

134 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2023–2026) · an approach in Retrieval and knowledge, keyword cluster “question · answering · editing”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

50 papers in 2023–24 and 84 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 21.9% to 12.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 0202021: 0212022: 0222023: 8232024: 42242025: 42252026: 4226

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

82 papers here report 887 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 24%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add cross-modality poolingOBQA · accuracy78.00 -> 79.80HelpedGraph Neural Prompting with Large Language Models (AAAI 2024 · 58 citations)
Use Chain-of-Thought prompting instead of a vanilla promptResident Standardization Training Exam, A1/A2 · accuracy37.26 -> 43.85HelpedMedBench: A Large-Scale Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Medical Large Language Models (AAAI 2024 · 36 citations)
Add coordinates to the promptWorldPop Population, 1,000 samples · Pearson's r^20.72 -> 0.733 (GPT-3.5); 0.63 -> 0.630 (Llama 2); 0.36 -> 0.413 (RoBERTa)MixedGeoLLM: Extracting Geospatial Knowledge from Large Language Models (ICLR 2024 · 33 citations)
Use direct GPT3.5 recommendations without constructing a reasoning graphAmazon Beauty · HR@5- 1.26 %HurtLLMRG: Improving Recommendations through Large Language Model Reasoning Graphs (AAAI 2024 · 32 citations)
add the siamese network for relevance scoringWebQSP · F180.1 -> 81.2HelpedHarnessing Large Language Models for Knowledge Graph Question Answering via Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-Augmentation (AAAI 2025 · 27 citations)
Remove the self-contrast metric from the overall knowledge-creating scoreHuman-judged overall quality correlation · Spearman correlation32% decreaseHurtKoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models (ICLR 2024 · 24 citations)
add RL-based knowledge extraction instead of heuristic subgraph extractionCommonsenseQA IHtest · accuracy0.739 -> 0.800HelpedKnowGPT: Knowledge Graph based Prompting for Large Language Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 23 citations)
Increase the initial cluster radiuszsRE · Forgotten editsHurtMELO: Enhancing Model Editing with Neuron-Indexed Dynamic LoRA (AAAI 2024 · 22 citations)
Provide answer hints to annotatorsLLMEval-1 · average score9.79% higher without hintsHurtLLMEval: A Preliminary Study on How to Evaluate Large Language Models (AAAI 2024 · 13 citations)
Increase candidate-answer diversity beyond 0.8RelQA-Cate · F1HelpedAttributive Reasoning for Hallucination Diagnosis of Large Language Models (AAAI 2025 · 12 citations)
add IR to TRQAHotpotQA · EM55.4 -> 61.2HelpedTree-of-Reasoning Question Decomposition for Complex Question Answering with Large Language Models (AAAI 2024 · 12 citations)
Add domain-specific pretraining to BLOOMZ_1b7JEC-QA All · accuracy23.89 -> 24.85HelpedBLADE: Enhancing Black-Box Large Language Models with Small Domain-Specific Models (AAAI 2025 · 11 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 48 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • TruthfulQA · 5 of 48 papers
  • HotpotQA · 4 of 48 papers
  • PubMedQA · 3 of 48 papers
  • MedQA · 3 of 48 papers
  • FeTaQA · 2 of 48 papers
  • TabFact · 2 of 48 papers
  • ZsRE · 2 of 48 papers
  • UMLS · 2 of 48 papers

Baselines

  • GPT-4o · 5 of 48 papers
  • GPT-3.5-Turbo · 4 of 48 papers
  • Mistral-7B · 3 of 48 papers
  • Random · 3 of 48 papers
  • GPT-4 · 2 of 48 papers
  • GPT-3.5 · 2 of 48 papers
  • Qwen2-7B · 2 of 48 papers
  • ChatGLM2-6B · 2 of 48 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 134 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 24 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy