AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Retrieval and knowledge

RAG robustness and evaluation

Benchmark, critique, and harden retrieval-augmented generation against noise and attacks.

164 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2023–2026) · an approach in Retrieval and knowledge, keyword cluster “retrieval augmented · augmented generation · generation rag”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

14 papers in 2023–24 and 150 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 6.1% to 22.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 0202021: 0212022: 0222023: 1232024: 13242025: 48252026: 10226

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

57 papers here report 648 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 26%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Remove reranking at inference9 general-domain benchmarks · Avg.52.6 -> 49.8HurtRankRAG: Unifying Context Ranking with Retrieval-Augmented Generation in LLMs (NeurIPS 2024 · 30 citations)
Increase retrieved chunks from k=5 to k=20RAG benchmark, varied top-k · F151.7→53.4HelpedRAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations)
Use GPT-4-Omni table parsing instead of raw-text extractionTabular FinHybrid · Exact Match68.0 -> 72.4HelpedUDA: A Benchmark Suite for Retrieval Augmented Generation in Real-World Document Analysis (NeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations)
Add reverse edges to increase sub-KG centralityGraphextQA test set · Hits@172.25 -> 68.24; 77.40 -> 88.20; 76.12 -> 77.51; 87.54 -> 88.93MixedA Systematic Exploration of Knowledge Graph Alignment with Large Language Models in Retrieval Augmented Generation (AAAI 2025 · 9 citations)
Select influential attention heads rather than modifying every attention headNQ and TriviaQA, ideal credibility scores · EMQwen1.5-7B: 27.20 -> 29.10 (NQ), 50.60 -> 52.90 (TriviaQA); Llama2-13B: 29.50 -> 33.60, 59.50 -> 59.90; Llama3-8B: 22.40HelpedCrAM: Credibility-Aware Attention Modification in LLMs for Combating Misinformation in RAG (AAAI 2025 · 9 citations)
apply two-stage instruction tuningChatRAG Bench · average score43.22 -> 54.14HelpedChatQA: Surpassing GPT-4 on Conversational QA and RAG (NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations)
Replace Louvain with random community detectionCWQ · hit@1 accuracy (%)43.8 -> 40.4; 45.0 -> 42.6HurtFast Think-on-Graph: Wider, Deeper and Faster Reasoning of Large Language Model on Knowledge Graph (AAAI 2025 · 8 citations)
remove recursive summaries from the relatedness treeAverage across MuSiQue, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and HotpotQA · F165.83 -> 64.04HurtSiReRAG: Indexing Similar and Related Information for Multihop Reasoning (ICLR 2025 · 8 citations)
Replace multi-perspective sampling with random document samplingTriviaQA and PubHealth · accuracy-1.22; -1.22HurtSpeculative RAG: Enhancing Retrieval Augmented Generation through Drafting (ICLR 2025 · 7 citations)
Train on a mixed distribution of NQ, WoW, FEVER, and MMLU instead of a single sourceUnseen RAG tasks · generalization performanceHelpedLong-Context LLMs Meet RAG: Overcoming Challenges for Long Inputs in RAG (ICLR 2025 · 6 citations)
increase retrieved pages beyond top-1 using page concatenationSix VQA datasets · accuracy (%) average36.16 -> 29.95; 36.16 -> 28.96HurtVisRAG: Vision-based Retrieval-augmented Generation on Multi-modality Documents (ICLR 2025 · 6 citations)
Increase chain length from L=1 to L=6 with greedy decoding2WikiQA · EM56.5 -> 70.6HelpedChain-of-Retrieval Augmented Generation (NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 65 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • HotpotQA · 23 of 65 papers
  • Natural Questions · 18 of 65 papers
  • 2WikiMultiHopQA · 15 of 65 papers
  • TriviaQA · 13 of 65 papers
  • MuSiQue · 11 of 65 papers
  • PopQA · 10 of 65 papers
  • ASQA · 7 of 65 papers
  • MS MARCO · 6 of 65 papers

Baselines

  • Self-RAG · 10 of 65 papers
  • BM25 · 7 of 65 papers
  • GPT-4o · 5 of 65 papers
  • GraphRAG · 5 of 65 papers
  • IRCoT · 5 of 65 papers
  • Vanilla RAG · 5 of 65 papers
  • Contriever · 4 of 65 papers
  • Iter-RetGen · 4 of 65 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 164 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 21 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy