AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Retrieval and knowledge

Long-context and personalized retrieval

Combine retrieval with long-context handling, calibration, and personalization benchmarks.

61 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2020–2026) · an approach in Retrieval and knowledge, keyword cluster “retrieval augmented · augmented generation · generation rag”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

20 papers in 2023–24 and 40 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.8% to 6.1%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 1202021: 0212022: 0222023: 2232024: 18242025: 16252026: 2426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

35 papers here report 393 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 76%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 16%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add node specificityMuSiQue · R@550.2 -> 51.9HelpedHippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for Large Language Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 105 citations)
Add QLoRA fine-tuningLLeQA test · METEOR11.6 -> 19.7HelpedInterpretable Long-Form Legal Question Answering with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models (AAAI 2024 · 81 citations)
Combine the proposed scores using Logistic RegressionFAVA-Annotation · detection performanceNo clear effectLLM-Check: Investigating Detection of Hallucinations in Large Language Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 41 citations)
increase RoPE base from 1.0×10^6 to 1.0×10^7 during In2 trainingVaL Probing All (20% training data) · Avg80.3 -> 84.9HelpedMake Your LLM Fully Utilize the Context (NeurIPS 2024 · 40 citations)
Add activity patternsNormal trajectory, normal data · DARD0.223 -> 0.125HelpedLarge Language Models as Urban Residents: An LLM Agent Framework for Personal Mobility Generation (NeurIPS 2024 · 36 citations)
remove the manager and have the last worker generate the final responseMuSiQue · F137.09 -> 26.79HurtChain of Agents: Large Language Models Collaborating on Long-Context Tasks (NeurIPS 2024 · 27 citations)
Increase generation steps from 3 to 5Game of 24 · success rate25.9 -> 31.8HelpedRATT: A Thought Structure for Coherent and Correct LLM Reasoning (AAAI 2025 · 22 citations)
Replace BM25 with embedding-based retrievalArcadeQA · accuracy37.7 -> 49.2HelpedTableRAG: Million-Token Table Understanding with Language Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations)
Remove retrievalAblation study · Citation recall83.48 (± 5.05) -> 60.11 (± 6.42)HurtAutoSurvey: Large Language Models Can Automatically Write Surveys (NeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations)
Use Dragon instead of no retrievalSeven long-context tasks · average score31.61 -> 35.73HelpedRetrieval meets Long Context Large Language Models (ICLR 2024 · 15 citations)
Add RAGSWC-101 · F1 (%)79.71 -> 95.45HelpedSCALM: Detecting Bad Practices in Smart Contracts Through LLMs (AAAI 2025 · 11 citations)
Use sentence-based retrieval instead of 512-token chunk retrievalBABILong QA1 · accuracyHelpedBABILong: Testing the Limits of LLMs with Long Context Reasoning-in-a-Haystack (NeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 21 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • NaturalQuestions · 3 of 21 papers
  • HotpotQA · 3 of 21 papers
  • HumanEval · 2 of 21 papers
  • TriviaQA · 2 of 21 papers

Baselines

  • GPT-4 · 2 of 21 papers
  • ChatGPT · 2 of 21 papers
  • Self-Rag · 2 of 21 papers
  • Claude-3.5-Sonnet · 2 of 21 papers
  • In-Context RAG · 2 of 21 papers
  • GPT-4o · 2 of 21 papers
  • RAPTOR · 2 of 21 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 60 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 22 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy