AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Data and hallucination detection

Detect pretraining data, hallucinations, and unsafe training data using token-level and attribution signals.

66 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2020–2026) · an approach in Language, safety and interpretability, keyword cluster “watermarking · generated text · watermarks”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

9 papers in 2023–24 and 54 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 1.3% to 2.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 2202021: 0212022: 1222023: 2232024: 7242025: 21252026: 3326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

27 papers here report 284 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 26%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add the LLM Judgment PredictorWeibo21 test · macro F10.773 -> 0.784HelpedBad Actor, Good Advisor: Exploring the Role of Large Language Models in Fake News Detection (AAAI 2024 · 221 citations)
add semantic post augmentationKaggle test · average Macro-F1 (%)71.40 -> 72.07HelpedLLM vs Small Model? Large Language Model Based Text Augmentation Enhanced Personality Detection Model (AAAI 2024 · 31 citations)
Remove singular-value weighting from membership scoreTruthfulQA · AUROC77.24 -> 78.64HurtHaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination Detection (NeurIPS 2024 · 19 citations)
Add RC semantic-consistency lossPolitiFact and Twitter-16 · accuracy and MacF1HelpedIs LLMs Hallucination Usable? LLM-based Negative Reasoning for Fake News Detection (AAAI 2025 · 13 citations)
Raise learning rate from 1 × 10^-5 to 1 × 10^-4BoolQ, Commonsense QA, IMDB, LSAT QA, and Truthful QA · AUCBoolQ: 0.64 -> 0.91; Commonsense QA: 0.59 -> 0.80; IMDB: 0.76 -> 0.98; LSAT QA: 0.72 -> 0.82; Truthful QA: 0.56 -> 0.74HelpedDetecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Models (ICLR 2024 · 13 citations)
Add feature internal semantic processingRansomware family classification · balanced-acc0.529 -> 0.548HelpedSRDC: Semantics-based Ransomware Detection and Classification with LLM-assisted Pre-training (AAAI 2025 · 8 citations)
add demonstration retrievalPheme · accuracy0.762 -> 0.788HelpedCollaborative Evolution: Multi-Round Learning Between Large and Small Language Models for Emergent Fake News Detection (AAAI 2025 · 7 citations)
Train the truth direction on affirmative and negated statements instead of affirmative statements aloneNegated statements · AUROCHelpedTruth is Universal: Robust Detection of Lies in LLMs (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
Use two-step fine-tuning including the curated explainable dataset rather than step 1 onlyReal-World · F-10.47 -> 0.87 (rank 8); 0.65 -> 0.92 (rank 16); 0.53 -> 0.96 (rank 32)HelpedScamNet: Toward Explainable Large Language Model-Based Fraudulent Shopping Website Detection (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Combine Neutral and Summary augmentationsAntiVax, Sentiment shortcut · accuracy58.0 -> 69.2 (54.7%↑)HelpedTruth over Tricks: Measuring and Mitigating Shortcut Learning in Misinformation Detection (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Increase question-aligned synthetic data from M=200 to M=1000X-Stance (avg. 10 questions) · F10.712 -> 0.723HelpedThe Power of LLM-Generated Synthetic Data for Stance Detection in Online Political Discussions (ICLR 2025 · 2 citations)
Increase examples from 0 to 10n2c2 test set, Drug · lenient F10.525 -> 0.400HurtEntity Only vs. Inline Approaches: Evaluating LLMs for Adverse Drug Event Detection in Clinical Text (Student Abstract) (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 26 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Twitter16 · 3 of 26 papers
  • TriviaQA · 3 of 26 papers
  • Pheme · 2 of 26 papers
  • Wikipedia · 2 of 26 papers
  • PolitiFact · 2 of 26 papers
  • Twitter-15 · 2 of 26 papers
  • SQuAD · 2 of 26 papers
  • BioASQ · 2 of 26 papers

Baselines

  • Min-K% · 4 of 26 papers
  • BERT · 3 of 26 papers
  • Zlib · 3 of 26 papers
  • Perplexity · 3 of 26 papers
  • RoBERTa · 2 of 26 papers
  • SVM · 2 of 26 papers
  • p(True) · 2 of 26 papers
  • Semantic Entropy · 2 of 26 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 63 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 25 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy