AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Agents, code and math

Long-horizon LLM agents

Train and structure LLM agents for long-horizon planning, exploration, and in-context learning.

155 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in Agents, code and math, keyword cluster “evaluating · capabilities · bench”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

26 papers in 2023–24 and 125 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 7.2% to 9.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 2192020: 1202021: 0212022: 1222023: 6232024: 20242025: 40252026: 8526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

62 papers here report 608 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 66%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 24%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
increase proposer count from 1 to 6 using different modelsAlpacaEval 2.0 · LC win rate47.8\% -> 61.3\%HelpedMixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilities (ICLR 2025 · 26 citations)
Use T5-Large instead of GPT2-LargeHumanML3D motion generation · R Top-10.454 -> 0.510HelpedAvatarGPT: All-in-One Framework for Motion Understanding Planning Generation and Beyond (CVPR 2024 · 24 citations)
Use beam Search Tree without Analysis and Repair or SelectionTidy kitchen · task completion (%)77.5 -> 50.0HurtImproving Knowledge Extraction from LLMs for Task Learning through Agent Analysis (AAAI 2024 · 19 citations)
Add P1 single-perception tuningTouchdown Dev Set · TC40.16 -> 41.15HelpedFLAME: Learning to Navigate with Multimodal LLM in Urban Environments (AAAI 2025 · 9 citations)
add reflection and iterative refinement to DLM16 public-health prompts · MNR0.87 ± 0.008 -> 0.93 ± 0.006HelpedA Decision-Language Model (DLM) for Dynamic Restless Multi-Armed Bandit Tasks in Public Health (NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations)
Add grounding-based feasibility feedback to the PDDL descriptionFive long-horizon tasks · executable-action success rateHelpedInstruction-Augmented Long-Horizon Planning: Embedding Grounding Mechanisms in Embodied Mobile Manipulation (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
Increase sampled plans from N=25 to N=50VirtualHome w/o correction · SR28.33±1.18 -> 28.14±2.45No clear effectTree-Planner: Efficient Close-loop Task Planning with Large Language Models (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)
combine LLM reward with the VLM rewardOpen-vocabulary humanoid skills · task completion (C)6.108 -> 6.954HelpedGROVE: A Generalized Reward for Learning Open-Vocabulary Physical Skill (CVPR 2025 · 4 citations)
Use transcript-style rather than dialogue-style negotiationsNegotiation games · agreement rate0.49 to 0.44HurtEvaluating Language Model Agency Through Negotiations (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)
Replace summarized history with raw historyHard 5-armed bandit, T=200 · suffix failure frequencyHurtCan large language models explore in-context? (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
replace GPT-4o with GPT-4o-miniFEA projects test set · success rate (%)90.2 -> 81.6HurtAutoFEA: Enhancing AI Copilot by Integrating Finite Element Analysis Using Large Language Models with Graph Neural Networks (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
add a checklist to reward assignmentWebRewardBench Mind2Web Cross-Task · Acc. (traj)0.0 -> 5.0HelpedWeb-Shepherd: Advancing PRMs for Reinforcing Web Agents (NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 59 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ALFWorld · 4 of 59 papers
  • Mind2Web · 3 of 59 papers
  • AITW · 2 of 59 papers
  • MiniWob · 2 of 59 papers
  • VirtualHome · 2 of 59 papers
  • ToolBench · 2 of 59 papers
  • API-Bank · 2 of 59 papers

Baselines

  • GPT-4o · 7 of 59 papers
  • ReAct · 6 of 59 papers
  • Claude-3.7-Sonnet · 4 of 59 papers
  • Gemini-2.5-Pro · 4 of 59 papers
  • DeepSeek-V3 · 3 of 59 papers
  • Claude-3.5-Haiku · 3 of 59 papers
  • GPT-4o-mini · 3 of 59 papers
  • Reflexion · 3 of 59 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 151 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 28 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy