AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Agents, code and math

LLM-guided program synthesis

Synthesize programs with LLMs through decomposition, learned abstractions, and per-instance search.

93 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Agents, code and math, keyword cluster “search · optimization · decision”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

22 papers in 2023–24 and 43 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 6.1% to 3.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 4172018: 3182019: 3192020: 9202021: 4212022: 4222023: 8232024: 14242025: 22252026: 2126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

65 papers here report 646 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 68%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 18%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use OPRO instead of one-step generation of 50 instructionsGSM8K · test accuracy60.8 -> 76.3HelpedLarge Language Models as Optimizers (ICLR 2024 · 93 citations)
Add query-plan CoT generationBIRD dev · execution accuracy (%)57.75 -> 63.62HelpedCHASE-SQL: Multi-Path Reasoning and Preference Optimized Candidate Selection in Text-to-SQL (ICLR 2025 · 7 citations)
Increase pseudo-data volume during domain adaptationChEBI-20 molecular captioning and molecule generation · overall metricsHelpedFrom Artificially Real to Real: Leveraging Pseudo Data from Large Language Models for Low-Resource Molecule Discovery (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Use goal-directed generation rather than undirected mutationProgramming puzzle generation · semantic diversityHelpedACES: Generating a Diversity of Challenging Programming Puzzles with Autotelic Generative Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Add dataset descriptions to program-generation promptsText datasets · label model performanceMixedThe ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper than LLM Data Annotators (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Use Normalized SQL instead of SQLSpider validation · execution accuracy48.7 -> 58.4HelpedEnhancing SQL Query Generation with Neurosymbolic Reasoning (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Use the compact sharpASP(STD) encoding instead of aspmc+STD or lp2sat+STDGroup 1 instances · BCP timeHelpedExact ASP Counting with Compact Encodings (AAAI 2024 · 2 citations)
add enumerative searchLOGO · solve rate (mean %)21.02 -> 48.95HelpedLILO: Learning Interpretable Libraries by Compressing and Documenting Code (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
use CNN-based scoring instead of Hamming distanceARC evaluation set (50 tasks) · accuracy25/50 -> 25/50No clear effectConceptSearch: Towards Efficient Program Search Using LLMs for Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Increase maximum observation subset size from 2 to 3LiveCodeBench · pass@kNo clear effectPlanning in Natural Language Improves LLM Search for Code Generation (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
remove adaptive searchHistory · difficulty0.440 -> 0.257HurtAutoBencher: Towards Declarative Benchmark Construction (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Add policy feedback through Expert IterationARC evaluation · cumulative solved tasks45/400 -> 59/400HelpedCodeIt: Self-Improving Language Models with Prioritized Hindsight Replay (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 28 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ConceptARC · 2 of 28 papers
  • LARC · 2 of 28 papers
  • ARC-DSL · 2 of 28 papers
  • Spider · 2 of 28 papers
  • CLUTRR · 2 of 28 papers
  • MBPP+ · 2 of 28 papers

Baselines

  • DeepSeek-R1 · 3 of 28 papers
  • Hamming distance scoring · 2 of 28 papers
  • OpenTuner · 2 of 28 papers
  • GPT-4.1 · 2 of 28 papers
  • o3-mini · 2 of 28 papers
  • GPT-4o · 2 of 28 papers
  • Gemini-1.5 Pro · 2 of 28 papers
  • Chain of Thought · 2 of 28 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 65 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy