AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Recommendation representation learning

Improves embeddings for recommender systems via multi-interest, inductive and collapse-aware modeling.

207 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Recognition and long-tail, keyword cluster “representations · transfer · unsupervised”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 1 of 1 tracked benchmark.

51 papers in 2023–24 and 68 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 4.1% to 5.2%.

Open questions the data points to

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 11162017: 6172018: 14182019: 17192020: 20202021: 12212022: 8222023: 24232024: 27242025: 30252026: 3826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

Beauty · NDCG@10 (higher is better)

4 papers, 2023–2025 · still improving

2023: 0.05372025: 0.0657
20232025

What has been tried

161 papers here report 1,582 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 78%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 14%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add dynamic embedding transportation to joint preference explorationBook->Movie · RMSE2.264 -> 1.206HelpedLearning Accurate and Bidirectional Transformation via Dynamic Embedding Transportation for Cross-Domain Recommendation (AAAI 2024 · 34 citations)
Add task-specific embeddings for all feature fields rather than noneTikTok · AUC0.8261 -> 0.8304HelpedSTEM: Unleashing the Power of Embeddings for Multi-Task Recommendation (AAAI 2024 · 33 citations)
add multitask learningTKY · Acc@10.2410 -> 0.2575HelpedLearning Time Slot Preferences via Mobility Tree for Next POI Recommendation (AAAI 2024 · 32 citations)
Use p=-2 instead of p=-1ML-1M, Phones, Sports, and Tools · Recall@2025.17 -> 25.51; 13.02 -> 13.03; 8.42 -> 8.52; 7.27 -> 7.42HelpedAdaptive Hardness Negative Sampling for Collaborative Filtering (AAAI 2024 · 28 citations)
add relevant-visit selectionMIMIC-III · Jaccard0.5163 -> 0.5282HelpedVITA: ‘Carefully Chosen and Weighted Less’ Is Better in Medication Recommendation (AAAI 2024 · 22 citations)
add worst-case factorAmazon all · Recall@200.0121 -> 0.0130HelpedTemporally and Distributionally Robust Optimization for Cold-Start Recommendation (AAAI 2024 · 21 citations)
Add Single-sequence AugmentationBeauty, Sports, Yelp, Home · N@10Beauty: 0.0415 -> 0.0455; Sports: 0.0209 -> 0.0242; Yelp: 0.0152 -> 0.0164; Home: 0.0097 -> 0.0128HelpedAugmenting Sequential Recommendation with Balanced Relevance and Diversity (AAAI 2025 · 20 citations)
Add dual-perspective metapath encoding instead of shared LSTM encodingZhaopin, candidates · R@50.8936 -> 0.9477HelpedKnowledge-Aware Explainable Reciprocal Recommendation (AAAI 2024 · 20 citations)
add ICL to the backboneSports, Beauty, Toys, Yelp · sum of HR@5, HR@20, NDCG@5, and NDCG@200.1343 -> 0.1379; 0.239 -> 0.2398; 0.2664 -> 0.2675; 0.1258 -> 0.1262HelpedEnd-to-end Learnable Clustering for Intent Learning in Recommendation (NeurIPS 2024 · 18 citations)
Add the preference-aware contrastive loss to PAD-CLRecAmazon Rec and Amazon Fashion, All/Warm/Cold · Recall@203.04 -> 3.22; 27.41 -> 28.11; 3.91 -> 4.18; 25.18 -> 27.39; 4.51 -> 4.89; 30.11 -> 30.41HelpedPreference Aware Dual Contrastive Learning for Item Cold-Start Recommendation (AAAI 2024 · 15 citations)
Add s1 (full-whitening sequence embedding)Arts, Toys, Tools · R@200.1650 -> 0.1710; 0.1217 -> 0.1307; 0.0866 -> 0.0918HelpedDual-View Whitening on Pre-trained Text Embeddings for Sequential Recommendation (AAAI 2024 · 12 citations)
Use only topics in preference pre-trainingTwibot-22 · performanceNo clear effectSeGA: Preference-Aware Self-Contrastive Learning with Prompts for Anomalous User Detection on Twitter (AAAI 2024 · 11 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
COGNetMIMIC-IVF10.573 – 0.6472 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2023 and AAAI 2024
COGNetMIMIC-IVPRAUC0.661 – 0.7072 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2023 and AAAI 2024

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 37 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Amazon Beauty · 4 of 37 papers
  • Tmall · 4 of 37 papers
  • Yelp · 3 of 37 papers
  • Diginetica · 3 of 37 papers
  • AmazonElectronics · 2 of 37 papers
  • Ali-CCP · 2 of 37 papers
  • Amazon Sports · 2 of 37 papers
  • Amazon Toys · 2 of 37 papers

Baselines

  • SASRec · 6 of 37 papers
  • GRU4Rec · 5 of 37 papers
  • BERT4Rec · 5 of 37 papers
  • DeepFM · 4 of 37 papers
  • BPR · 3 of 37 papers
  • ICLRec · 3 of 37 papers
  • NARM · 3 of 37 papers
  • SR-GNN · 3 of 37 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 119 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy