AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Noisy labels

Loss correction and noise robustness theory

Corrects losses and analyzes how overfitting and subclass structure affect noisy training.

77 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Noisy labels, keyword cluster “label noise · transition · instance”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

17 papers in 2023–24 and 24 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 14.0% to 19.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 2172018: 6182019: 2192020: 7202021: 9212022: 6222023: 11232024: 6242025: 13252026: 1126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

60 papers here report 623 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 23%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add class-level curriculum learning (C-CL) to a model without curriculum learningCIFAR-100N, Food101, and miniWV, 5-way 5-shot · accuracyHelpedDual-Level Curriculum Meta-Learning for Noisy Few-Shot Learning Tasks (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
Remove scaling noise (use shift-only GNI)CIFAR-100 validation · accuracyHurtGhost Noise for Regularizing Deep Neural Networks (AAAI 2024 · 2 citations)
Use SGD-Shapley labels, which have non-negligible bias, instead of unbiased Shapley estimatorsImageNette · Attribution estimation errorHurtStochastic Amortization: A Unified Approach to Accelerate Feature and Data Attribution (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Add batch normalization and data augmentation to Label WaveCIFAR-10, 40% symmetric noise · test accuracy63.00±0.86% -> 66.79±0.39%HelpedEarly Stopping Against Label Noise Without Validation Data (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
add a Task Encoder rather than a fully connected networkHandwriting I · accuracy93.6% -> 96.1%HelpedDeCorrNet: Enhancing Neural Decoding Performance by Eliminating Correlations in Noise (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
Remove a portion of examples with high influence scoresMNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 · test accuracyHurtRethinking Benign Overfitting in Two-Layer Neural Networks (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use hard rather than soft pseudo-labelsNoisy Gaussian mixture · generalization error improvementNo clear effectThe Effect of Optimal Self-Distillation in Noisy Gaussian Mixture Model (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Add kNN label spreading before RADCelebA at 20% and 30% label noise · WGA0 (0) -> 82.29 (1.25); 0 (0) -> 79.5 (1.91)HelpedEnhancing Robustness of Last Layer Two-Stage Fair Model Corrections (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Remove the consistency regularization term (α = 0)Artificially noised confidence-difference datasets · accuracyHurtConfidence Difference Reflects Various Supervised Signals in Confidence-Difference Classification (ICML 2025)
add Matching lossLF-WikiSeeAlsoTitles-320K · P@134.12 -> 34.62HelpedMOGIC: Metadata-infused Oracle Guidance for Improved Extreme Classification (ICML 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 16 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 5 of 16 papers
  • MNIST · 3 of 16 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 16 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 41 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy