AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Noisy labels

Noisy cross-modal hashing and multi-label

Handles noisy labels in cross-modal retrieval and multi-label classification via robust hashing and loss handling.

49 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Noisy labels, keyword cluster “noisy labels · robust · clean”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

11 papers in 2023–24 and 18 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 9.1% to 14.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 1172018: 1182019: 2192020: 5202021: 3212022: 5222023: 5232024: 6242025: 7252026: 1126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

38 papers here report 390 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 75%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 16%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add warm-up trainingXMedia, noise 0.6, 128 bits (average MAP) · MAP84.3 -> 88.6HelpedRobust Self-Paced Hashing for Cross-Modal Retrieval with Noisy Labels (AAAI 2025 · 17 citations)
Add reconstruction loss LrecScene15, 20% noise · ACC18.29 -> 45.65HelpedROLL: Robust Noisy Pseudo-label Learning for Multi-View Clustering with Noisy Correspondence (CVPR 2025 · 14 citations)
Add sample filtrationCC152K · image-to-text R@132.5 -> 37.3HelpedNoisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigation (AAAI 2024 · 11 citations)
Replace identity weighting with the pre-trained calibratorMS-COCO, 80% noise · mAP (%)59.93 -> 61.48HelpedCalibrated Disambiguation for Partial Multi-label Learning (AAAI 2025 · 8 citations)
add label filtering and reconstruction rather than training directly on original noisy dataMIR Flickr, NUS-WIDE, and MS COCO, 40% noisy labels, 64 bits · MAP0.784 -> 0.846; 0.721 -> 0.755; 0.610 -> 0.631HelpedDistribution-Consistency-Guided Multi-modal Hashing (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
Use noisy constraints rather than unconstrained learningIGGP, Zendo, program synthesis, Alzheimer, and WN18RR tasks · learning time109 ± 2 -> 2 ± 0HelpedLearning MDL Logic Programs from Noisy Data (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Apply CRL with collaborative refining (LRD and RUS) instead of majority-vote label aggregationAblation datasets (Avg.) · AUC0.643 -> 0.814HelpedCollaborative Refining for Learning from Inaccurate Labels (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Add the Answer Diffuser (AD)VQA-RAD 10%-Semantic Noise · overall accuracy68.25 -> 71.15HelpedDiN: Diffusion Model for Robust Medical VQA with Semantic Noisy Labels (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
Fine-tune the MAE feature extractor for SimiFeatNoisy Ostracods test/validation · Hit rate27.55 -> 28.18HelpedNoisy Ostracods: A Fine-Grained, Imbalanced Real-World Dataset for Benchmarking Robust Machine Learning and Label Correction Methods (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Add label refinement onlyCIFAR-100 · top-1 accuracy47.5 -> 48.0HelpedGIFT: Unlocking Full Potential of Labels in Distilled Dataset at Near-zero Cost (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 9 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • NUS-WIDE · 3 of 9 papers
  • XMediaNet · 2 of 9 papers
  • CUB · 2 of 9 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 9 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 29 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy