atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Noisy labels

Rethinking Benign Overfitting in Two-Layer Neural Networks

ICML 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Noisy labels · approach: Loss correction and noise robustness theory · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Refines the feature-noise data model with class-dependent noise covariances and proves a benign-vs-harmful overfitting phase transition for two-layer ReLU CNNs, showing memorized class-dependent noise can help long-tailed generalization.

Problem

Prior feature-noise theory predicts harmful overfitting when noise is large, yet overparameterized networks rarely overfit harmfully and empirically memorizing atypical long-tailed examples helps generalization; the paper asks how to theoretically explain benign overfitting in such networks.

Approach

Replace the homogeneous noise model with class-dependent noise covariances A_y, so neurons learn implicit features from class-specific noise; derive test-loss bounds in terms of signal-to-noise ratio and a noise correlation ratio, and a training-free influence score based on intra-class covariance Frobenius norm.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Increase the noise correlation ratioTwo-layer CNN on synthetic data · Synthetic datatest accuracyHelped
Increase feature strengthTwo-layer CNN on synthetic data · Synthetic datatest accuracyHelped
Use higher noise correlation with feature strength near zeroTwo-layer CNN on synthetic data · Synthetic datatest accuracyHelped
Increase dataset sizeTwo-layer CNN using explicit features · Synthetic data, feature-based classificationtest accuracyHelped
Increase dataset sizeTwo-layer CNN using implicit features · Synthetic data, noise-based classificationtest accuracyNo clear effect
Remove a portion of examples with high influence scores (ablation)LeNet, ResNet-18, and ResNet-101 · MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100test accuracyHurt
Remove a portion of examples with low influence scores (ablation)LeNet, ResNet-18, and ResNet-101 · MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100test accuracyHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MNIST CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 synthetic feature-noise data

Benchmarks: MNIST CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 synthetic feature-noise data

Metrics: zero-one test loss (accuracy) training loss test accuracy after removing high/low influence samples

Baselines: Kou et al. 2023 Cao et al. 2022

Builds on: Kou et al. 2023 benign overfitting in two-layer CNNs Cao et al. 2022 benign overfitting feature-noise model feldman memorization in long-tailed data

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy