Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Noisy labels
The Impact Label Noise and Choice of Threshold has on Cross-Entropy and Soft-Dice in Image Segmentation
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Shows theoretically and experimentally that under Gaussian-field label noise, soft-Dice optima can be recovered by thresholding cross-entropy optima at an a priori unknown, efficiently computable threshold, which matches soft-Dice performance while keeping cross-entropy stability.
Problem
Cross-entropy and soft-Dice segmentation losses yield different predictions under label noise, and the common fixed 0.5 threshold is suboptimal for Dice; the mechanism behind this discrepancy is not well understood.
Approach
Introduces a Gaussian field deformation label-noise model with closed-form marginals, characterizes optimal segmentations for cross-entropy and soft-Dice, and shows that thresholding the cross-entropy optimum at a computable threshold t_m = sup Dice/2 recovers the soft-Dice optimum.
Key results
- On the esophagus, CE with the computed threshold (CE(*)) outperforms CE with 0.5 threshold, closing the gap to SD(0) as noise increases; on kidney and aorta the gap is smaller.
- Performance of CE(0) and SD(0) is indistinguishable at zero noise and diverges as noise strength a increases to 0.03.
- Theory: optimal CE thresholded at t_m = sup Dice/2 gives the soft-Dice optimal segmentation (Eq. 23).
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use the alternative threshold instead of 0.5 with cross-entropy | 3D U-Net trained with cross-entropy · TotalSegmentator kidney, aorta, and esophagus segmentation | Dice | Helped |
| Use soft-Dice instead of cross-entropy, both with threshold 0.5 | 3D U-Net · TotalSegmentator kidney, aorta, and esophagus segmentation with increasing label noise | Dice | Helped |
| Use cross-entropy instead of soft-Dice, both with threshold 0.5 | 3D U-Net · TotalSegmentator kidney, aorta, and esophagus segmentation with increasing label noise | Accuracy | Helped |
| Increase label noise | Cross-entropy and soft-Dice with threshold 0.5 · TotalSegmentator kidney, aorta, and esophagus segmentation | Dice | Mixed |
Surprising findings
- The noise model is approximately volume preserving, yet optimal segmentations under noise are systematically reshaped (corners smoothed, thin structures and holes removed).
Limitations
- Experiments are limited to noise produced by the proposed noise model.
- Threshold must be computed for every prediction, adding overhead for large images or many classes.
- Soft-Dice equivalence with expectation-based definitions holds only approximately when noise volume variance is small.
Experimental setup
Datasets: TotalSegmentator
Benchmarks: TotalSegmentator (kidney, aorta, esophagus)
Metrics: Dice
Baselines: CE(0) SD(0)
Builds on: soft-Dice Dice optimal segmentation characterization (Nordström et al.) threshold classifiers (Ye and Zhong)
Closest papers by meaning
- On Image Segmentation With Noisy Labels: Characterization and Volume Properties of the Optimal Solutions to Accuracy and Dice (NeurIPS 2022 · similarity 0.88)
- That Label's got Style: Handling Label Style Bias for Uncertain Image Segmentation (ICLR 2023 · similarity 0.84)
- From Label Smoothing to Label Relaxation (AAAI 2021 · similarity 0.84)
- RankED: Addressing Imbalance and Uncertainty in Edge Detection Using Ranking-based Losses (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.82)
- Uncertainty-aware Fine-tuning of Segmentation Foundation Models (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.82)
- Don’t Label Twice: Quantity Beats Quality when Comparing Binary Classifiers on a Budget (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.82)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
