atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Noisy labels

The Impact Label Noise and Choice of Threshold has on Cross-Entropy and Soft-Dice in Image Segmentation

CVPR 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Noisy labels · approach: Loss correction and noise robustness theory · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows theoretically and experimentally that under Gaussian-field label noise, soft-Dice optima can be recovered by thresholding cross-entropy optima at an a priori unknown, efficiently computable threshold, which matches soft-Dice performance while keeping cross-entropy stability.

Problem

Cross-entropy and soft-Dice segmentation losses yield different predictions under label noise, and the common fixed 0.5 threshold is suboptimal for Dice; the mechanism behind this discrepancy is not well understood.

Approach

Introduces a Gaussian field deformation label-noise model with closed-form marginals, characterizes optimal segmentations for cross-entropy and soft-Dice, and shows that thresholding the cross-entropy optimum at a computable threshold t_m = sup Dice/2 recovers the soft-Dice optimum.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the alternative threshold instead of 0.5 with cross-entropy3D U-Net trained with cross-entropy · TotalSegmentator kidney, aorta, and esophagus segmentationDiceHelped
Use soft-Dice instead of cross-entropy, both with threshold 0.53D U-Net · TotalSegmentator kidney, aorta, and esophagus segmentation with increasing label noiseDiceHelped
Use cross-entropy instead of soft-Dice, both with threshold 0.53D U-Net · TotalSegmentator kidney, aorta, and esophagus segmentation with increasing label noiseAccuracyHelped
Increase label noiseCross-entropy and soft-Dice with threshold 0.5 · TotalSegmentator kidney, aorta, and esophagus segmentationDiceMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: TotalSegmentator

Benchmarks: TotalSegmentator (kidney, aorta, esophagus)

Metrics: Dice

Baselines: CE(0) SD(0)

Builds on: soft-Dice Dice optimal segmentation characterization (Nordström et al.) threshold classifiers (Ye and Zhong)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy