AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Image generation / GANs

Stabilized GAN training

Improve GAN stability, convergence, and limited-data training with new objectives and discriminators.

144 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in GANs, keyword cluster “gans · mode · samples”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 1 of 6 tracked benchmarks.

24 papers in 2023–24 and 9 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 41.4% to 36.0%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: CelebA (FID, last in 2023); STL-10 (FID, last in 2024); CIFAR-10 (Inception score, last in 2021); FFHQ (FID, last in 2023).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 9172018: 26182019: 24192020: 29202021: 14212022: 9222023: 13232024: 11242025: 5252026: 426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CIFAR-10 · FID (lower is better)

24 papers, 2018–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2018: 16.432019: 14.72021: 12.12023: 10.542024: 2.06
20182025
YearBest so farSet by
201816.43Banach Wasserstein GAN (NeurIPS 2018 · 121 citations)
201914.7Progressive Augmentation of GANs (NeurIPS 2019 · 16 citations)
202112.1Dynamically Grown Generative Adversarial Networks (AAAI 2021 · 13 citations)
202310.54Dynamically Masked Discriminator for GANs (NeurIPS 2023 · 0 citations)
20242.06SMaRt: Improving GANs with Score Matching Regularity (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

CelebA · FID (lower is better)

10 papers, 2018–2023 · not reported since 2023

2018: 9.32019: 6.792022: 6.3
20182023

CIFAR-10 unconditional · FID (lower is better)

8 papers, 2019–2025 · still improving

2019: 18.582020: 12.22021: 11.822023: 2.552024: 1.542025: 1.38
20192025

STL-10 · FID (lower is better)

7 papers, 2018–2024 · not reported since 2024

2018: 40.12019: 30.82020: 26.162022: 232024: 19.27
20182024

CIFAR-10 · Inception score (higher is better)

6 papers, 2018–2021 · not reported since 2021

2018: 8.8
20182021
YearBest so farSet by
20188.8Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation (ICLR 2018 · 1,535 citations)

FFHQ · FID (lower is better)

6 papers, 2020–2023 · not reported since 2023

2020: 7.482021: 4.062023: 2.45
20202023

What has been tried

134 papers here report 1,464 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 71%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 19%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Remove informative weights from DMPRACelebA-HQ · FIDHurtGenerative Model Perception Rectification Algorithm for Trade-Off between Diversity and Quality (AAAI 2024 · 12 citations)
Add structural guidanceImageNet · FID4.59 -> 3.57HelpedStructure-Guided Adversarial Training of Diffusion Models (CVPR 2024 · 10 citations)
Use 8 × 8 for unconditional training resolutionAnimalFaces-LT · FID-FS50.3 -> 48.4HelpedTaming the Tail in Class-Conditional GANs: Knowledge Sharing via Unconditional Training at Lower Resolutions (CVPR 2024 · 8 citations)
Increase LoRA updates to 50 steps per iteration2D score distillation · image qualityHurtAdversarial Score Distillation: When score distillation meets GAN (CVPR 2024 · 7 citations)
Increase K from 1 to 10 while keeping the total discriminator parameters at 2MSTL10 · FID29.10 -> 22.72HelpedDiscriminative Forests Improve Generative Diversity for Generative Adversarial Networks (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
Vary q1 across the tested valuesSteering Angle 64×64 · SFID1.125 (0.510); 1.114 (0.503); 1.161 (0.540); 1.187 (0.558)No clear effectTurning Waste into Wealth: Leveraging Low-Quality Samples for Enhancing Continuous Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
add regression generator loss without DiffAugCIFAR-10 · FID5.31 -> 4.51HurtMCGAN: Enhancing GAN Training with Regression-Based Generator Loss (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
remove activation functions, making score functions and discriminators purely linearcheetah-run · performanceMixedDiffusing States and Matching Scores: A New Framework for Imitation Learning (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Add 0-mean regularizationCIFAR-10 10% data · tFID9.20 -> 8.27HelpedCHAIN: Enhancing Generalization in Data-Efficient GANs via lipsCHitz continuity constrAIned Normalization (CVPR 2024 · 1 citation)
Set λ to 0.25 rather than λ=0.00Obama 100-shot · FID46.87 -> 41.27HelpedImproving the Training of Data-Efficient GANs via Quality Aware Dynamic Discriminator Rejection Sampling (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use a wide range of α, β settingsClass-conditional CIFAR-10 · FIDHelpedDirect Discriminative Optimization: Your Likelihood-Based Visual Generative Model is Secretly a GAN Discriminator (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Apply MS^3D to both real and generated data instead of real data onlyOxfordDog · FID47.05 -> 42.73HelpedMS$^3$D: A RG Flow-Based Regularization for GAN Training with Limited Data (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
WGAN-GPCIFAR-10FID18.86 – 40.26 papers, e.g. ICML 2019 and ICLR 2018
WGAN-GPCIFAR-10Inception Score6.68 – 7.864 papers, e.g. ICLR 2018 and AAAI 2021
WGAN-GPCelebAFID10.03 – 54.712 papers, e.g. CVPR 2020 and NeurIPS 2019
WGAN-GPSTL10FID27.85 – 55.12 papers, e.g. CVPR 2020 and ICLR 2018
DistGANCIFAR-10FID17.61 – 22.952 papers, e.g. AAAI 2021 and AAAI 2019

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 6 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 6 papers

Baselines

  • StyleGAN2-ada · 2 of 6 papers
  • EDM · 2 of 6 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 33 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy