AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Image generation / GANs

Large-scale GAN latent analysis

Train high-fidelity GANs and analyze their latent semantics.

108 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in GANs, keyword cluster “synthesis · latent · face”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

10 papers in 2023–24 and 4 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 17.2% to 16.0%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: CIFAR-10 (FID, last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 5172018: 9182019: 13192020: 13202021: 30212022: 21222023: 8232024: 2242025: 3252026: 126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CIFAR-10 · FID (lower is better)

4 papers, 2019–2022 · not reported since 2022

2019: 14.732020: 13.412022: 7.7
20192022

What has been tried

103 papers here report 1,105 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 72%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 19%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Remove random cropping during trainingMinecraft sample generation · Visual qualityHurtProcedural Level Generation with Diffusion Models from a Single Example (AAAI 2024 · 9 citations)
Use re-captioned training dataMS COCO, 64×64 · zero-shot FID30K22.44 -> 16.72HelpedExploring Sparse MoE in GANs for Text-conditioned Image Synthesis (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
Use code dimension 1 instead of 4Oxford-Dog · FID36.30 -> 37.93HurtStyle Quantization for Data-Efficient GAN Training (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
use the 3RB+1TB architecture instead of Pix2pix's 9RB architectureFFHQ concepts · FID49.14 -> 42.65HelpedE$^2$GAN: Efficient Training of Efficient GANs for Image-to-Image Translation (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Use hybrid decoding instead of pure sampling or greedy decodingCVRP and TSP, varying sizes · Gap (%)HelpedAdversarial Generative Flow Network for Solving Vehicle Routing Problems (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
AttnGANCOCOFID35.49 – 77.012 papers, e.g. CVPR 2019 and ICLR 2020
AttnGANCUBFID13.02 – 23.982 papers, e.g. ICLR 2020 and CVPR 2019
StyleGAN2FFHQ 256×256FID3.62 – 5.142 papers, e.g. CVPR 2022 and NeurIPS 2021

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 14 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 26 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy