AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Image generation / GANs

Conditional GANs

Improve conditional image synthesis with diversity and contrastive objectives.

25 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2024) · an approach in GANs, keyword cluster “synthesis · latent · face”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Preprints Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

1 papers in 2023–24 and 0 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 1.7% to 0.0%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: CIFAR10 (FID, last in 2021).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 3172018: 3182019: 6192020: 7202021: 4212022: 1222023: 0232024: 1242025: 0252026: 026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CIFAR10 · FID (lower is better)

4 papers, 2018–2021 · not reported since 2021

2018: 17.52020: 10.6
20182021
YearBest so farSet by
201817.5cGANs with Projection Discriminator (ICLR 2018 · 407 citations)
202010.6ContraGAN: Contrastive Learning for Conditional Image Generation (NeurIPS 2020 · 94 citations)

What has been tried

25 papers here report 283 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 73%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 20%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use noise truncation instead of PGD truncationConditional image generation · Visual plausibilityHelpedAttack Deterministic Conditional Image Generative Models for Diverse and Controllable Generation (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
BicycleGANMapsLPIPS0.115 – 0.2472 papers, e.g. CVPR 2019 and CVPR 2021
BicycleGANMapsFID130.74 – 145.782 papers, e.g. CVPR 2021 and CVPR 2019

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 20 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy