AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Image generation / GANs

Generative adversarial network theory

Analyzes and stabilizes GAN training through kernels, Langevin dynamics and structure preservation.

62 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in GANs, keyword cluster “gans · mode · samples”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Preprints Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports The tracked benchmarks have at most one report from 2025–26 that could beat the old record, too few to say whether they are still moving.

4 papers in 2023–24 and 2 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 6.9% to 8.0%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 8172018: 10182019: 17192020: 5202021: 4212022: 11222023: 2232024: 2242025: 1252026: 126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CIFAR-10 · FID (lower is better)

5 papers, 2019–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2019: 17.22021: 8.93
20192025
YearBest so farSet by
201917.2Adaptive Density Estimation for Generative Models (NeurIPS 2019 · 4 citations)
20218.93Partition-Guided GANs (CVPR 2021 · 13 citations)

What has been tried

58 papers here report 574 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 22%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use the 1G2CGAN strategy of mutating the last two convolutional layersMNIST · image qualityHurtNeuroevolution of a Multi-Generator GAN (Student Abstract) (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
reduce K from 512 to 64FFHQ-64x64 · FID43.1 -> 47.0HurtDiscrete Distribution Networks (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use the transport cost function rather than removing costCIFAR-10 · recall0.13 -> 0.62HelpedAnalyzing and Improving Optimal-Transport-based Adversarial Networks (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
DCGANCIFAR-10FID33.71 – 37.12 papers, e.g. AAAI 2020 and ICLR 2025

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 24 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy