atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

ODDN: Addressing Unpaired Data Challenges in Open-World Deepfake Detection on Online Social Networks

AAAI 2025 · Image generation › Autoregressive and latent generation · approach: Generalizable fake image detection · 7 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ODDN, a ResNet-50 deepfake detector that handles mostly unpaired compressed/raw images from OSNs by clustering-based coarse alignment for unpaired data, HSIC for the 20% paired data, and PCGrad-projected adversarial compression discarding, evaluated on 17 GAN datasets.

Problem

Deepfake/AI-generated image detection on online social networks where compressed images are abundant but paired raw originals are scarce, so most training data is unpaired and compression varies across platforms.

Approach

Uses fine-grained HSIC alignment for the small paired subset and coarse cluster-center alignment (real/fake and compressed/uncompressed centers) for unpaired data, plus a gradient-reversal compression-discard branch whose gradients are reconciled with PCGrad so the encoder becomes insensitive to compression.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use ODDN instead of QADDeepfake detection · 17 GAN datasets, quality-aware, 2-class trainingmean accuracy: 69.2 -> 71.4Helped
Use ODDN instead of QADDeepfake detection · 17 GAN datasets, quality-aware, 4-class trainingmean accuracy: 70.9 -> 72.6Helped
Use ODDN instead of QADDeepfake detection · 17 GAN datasets, quality-agnostic, 2-class trainingmean accuracy: 68.3 -> 70.7Helped
Use ODDN instead of QADDeepfake detection · 17 GAN datasets, quality-agnostic, 4-class trainingmean accuracy: 71.0 -> 72.1Helped
Add ODA (ablation)Baseline deepfake detector · 17 GAN datasets, quality-aware, 2-class trainingmean accuracy: 69.4 -> 71.0Helped
Add CGC to the baseline with ODA (ablation)Baseline + ODA · 17 GAN datasets, quality-aware, 2-class trainingmean accuracy: 71.0 -> 71.4Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ForenSynths GANGen-Detection

Benchmarks: ForenSynths GANGen-Detection

Metrics: accuracy

Baselines: MesoNet FF++ F3Net MAT SBIs ADD QAD

Builds on: PCGrad HSIC domain-adversarial training ForenSynths

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy