atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filtering

NeurIPS 2016 · Graph learning › GNN architectures · approach: Theory of graph convolutional networks · 1,699 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Chebyshev spectral filters (localized, K=25) instead of non-parametric filters (ablation)graph CNN on MNIST · MNIST GC32-P4-GC64-P4-FC512accuracy (%): 96.28 -> 99.14Helped
Chebyshev parametrization instead of spline parametrization of spectral filtersspectral graph CNN · MNIST GC32-P4-GC64-P4-FC512accuracy (%): 97.15 -> 99.14Helped
Chebyshev parametrization instead of spline parametrization of spectral filterssingle graph conv layer GC10 · MNIST GC10accuracy (%): 97.26 -> 97.48Helped
Chebyshev filters instead of non-parametric filters on single layer (ablation)graph CNN GC10 · MNIST GC10accuracy (%): 95.75 -> 97.48Helped
Use 8-NN 2D grid graph instead of random graph (ablation)graph CNN on MNIST · MNIST GC32-P4-GC64-P4-FC512accuracy (%): 95.39 -> 99.14Helped
Use 8-NN 2D grid graph instead of random graph (ablation)GC32 single layer · MNIST GC32accuracy (%): 96.88 -> 97.40Helped
Learned word2vec feature graph instead of bag-of-words-based graph (ablation)GC32 on 20NEWS · 20NEWSaccuracy (%): 67.50 (bag-of-words) vs 68.26 (learned word2vec)Mixed
Random feature graph instead of word2vec-based graph (ablation)GC32 on 20NEWS · 20NEWSaccuracy (%): 68.26 -> 67.75Hurt
Proposed graph CNN vs classical CNN (time per minibatch)graph CNN on MNIST · MNIST time per mini-batch, CPUtime (ms): 210 -> 1600 msHurt
Graph CNN with Chebyshev filters vs. classical CNN accuracy on MNISTgraph CNN on MNIST · MNISTaccuracy (%): 99.33 vs 99.14No clear effect
Graph CNN (GC32) vs fully connected networks on 20NEWSgraph CNN on 20NEWS · 20NEWSaccuracy (%): 68.26 vs FC2500 64.64 and FC2500-FC500 65.76Helped
Graph CNN (GC32) vs multinomial naive Bayes on 20NEWSgraph CNN on 20NEWS · 20NEWSaccuracy (%): 68.26 vs 68.51Hurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy