AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / 3D detection and driving

LiDAR perception for driving

Build efficient LiDAR detectors, anomaly datasets, and generative models for driving perception.

75 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in 3D detection and driving, keyword cluster “bev · autonomous · radar”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

26 papers in 2023–24 and 32 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 16.5% to 21.1%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 1192020: 4202021: 4212022: 8222023: 13232024: 13242025: 15252026: 1726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

57 papers here report 630 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 74%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 21%, mixed 1%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add cooperative vehicle-infrastructure camera-LiDAR fusion instead of vehicle-only camera-LiDAR perceptionTUMTraf-V2X test set, south2 FOV · mAP3D76.40 -> 90.76; +14.36 3D mAPHelpedTUMTraf V2X Cooperative Perception Dataset (CVPR 2024 · 110 citations)
Replace Average Fusion with CoBEVT fusionDeepAccident validation · APA67.1 -> 69.5HelpedDeepAccident: A Motion and Accident Prediction Benchmark for V2X Autonomous Driving (AAAI 2024 · 97 citations)
jointly train detection and segmentationnuScenes val · mIoU0.652 -> 0.656HelpedPanoOcc: Unified Occupancy Representation for Camera-based 3D Panoptic Segmentation (CVPR 2024 · 82 citations)
Remove prompt fusion and use all tracking instances as prompt predictionsNuPrompt validation · AMOTA0.259 -> 0.073HurtLanguage Prompt for Autonomous Driving (AAAI 2025 · 62 citations)
enable collaboration across CAVsOPV2V semantic occupancy prediction · IoU38.52 -> 50.46HelpedCollaborative Semantic Occupancy Prediction with Hybrid Feature Fusion in Connected Automated Vehicles (CVPR 2024 · 36 citations)
Add data-space alignmentSemanticKITTI, nuScenes, and Waymo Open · mIoU54.03 -> 69.01; 59.84 -> 76.89; 65.39 -> 69.37HelpedMulti-Space Alignments Towards Universal LiDAR Segmentation (CVPR 2024 · 24 citations)
replace PFN with SPEnuScenes validation · mAP48.72 -> 49.75HelpedSwiftPillars: High-Efficiency Pillar Encoder for Lidar-Based 3D Detection (AAAI 2024 · 12 citations)
Use continuous occupancy pre-training with balanced positive and negative query samples instead of depth renderingArgoverse 2 Sensor · NFCD (m2)1.79 -> 0.83HelpedUnO: Unsupervised Occupancy Fields for Perception and Forecasting (CVPR 2024 · 12 citations)
Add multi-task detection and segmentation training to the M3Net occupancy modelnuScenes-Occupancy val · mIoU6%HelpedM3Net: Multimodal Multi-task Learning for 3D Detection, Segmentation, and Occupancy Prediction in Autonomous Driving (AAAI 2025 · 9 citations)
Remove patch projectionaiMotive · all-point AP-1.03HurtHyperdimensional Uncertainty Quantification for Multimodal Uncertainty Fusion in Autonomous Vehicles Perception (CVPR 2025 · 9 citations)
Add pseudo point clouds to the convolutional feature branchOpenAD 3D converter · AR18.38 -> 23.32HelpedOpenAD: Open-World Autonomous Driving Benchmark for 3D Object Detection (NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations)
Add sparse-to-dense distillationOPV2V average across corruptions · AP@0.5/0.779.75/70.54 -> 83.42/73.92HelpedDSRC: Learning Density-Insensitive and Semantic-Aware Collaborative Representation Against Corruptions (AAAI 2025 · 7 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 17 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • nuScenes · 10 of 17 papers
  • KITTI · 3 of 17 papers
  • OPV2V · 2 of 17 papers
  • DAIR-V2X · 2 of 17 papers
  • Argoverse2 · 2 of 17 papers
  • SemanticKITTI · 2 of 17 papers
  • nuScenes-C · 2 of 17 papers
  • Waymo · 2 of 17 papers

Baselines

  • TPVFormer · 3 of 17 papers
  • BEVFormer · 3 of 17 papers
  • No Collaboration · 2 of 17 papers
  • Late Fusion · 2 of 17 papers
  • V2VNet · 2 of 17 papers
  • V2X-ViT · 2 of 17 papers
  • CoAlign · 2 of 17 papers
  • CoBEVT · 2 of 17 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 58 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 35 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy