AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / 3D detection and driving

Monocular 3D object detection

Improve single-image 3D detection with auxiliary contexts, distillation, and depth-aware losses.

56 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in 3D detection and driving, keyword cluster “3d object · monocular · kitti”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

13 papers in 2023–24 and 11 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.2% to 7.2%.

No longer reported by papers here: KITTI test, Car moderate (AP3D, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 2182019: 4192020: 6202021: 7212022: 12222023: 5232024: 8242025: 1252026: 1026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

KITTI test, Car moderate · AP3D (higher is better)

4 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 10.852022: 17.74
20192024

What has been tried

45 papers here report 497 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 78%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 16%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
predict y from global rather than local cluesKITTI val Car · AP3D Moderate13.49 -> 17.85HelpedMonoCD: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Complementary Depths (CVPR 2024 · 73 citations)
add occupancy learning in frustum spaceKITTI val Car · AP3D (IoU=0.7) Moderate17.05 -> 17.79HelpedLearning Occupancy for Monocular 3D Object Detection (CVPR 2024 · 31 citations)
add decoupled queryKITTI val, Car Moderate · AP3D21.48 -> 22.34HelpedMonoDGP: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Decoupled-Query and Geometry-Error Priors (CVPR 2025 · 25 citations)
add the proposal headOmni3D unified detection · AP3D12.3% -> 15.9%HelpedUniMODE: Unified Monocular 3D Object Detection (CVPR 2024 · 22 citations)
Use cross-attention instead of direct concatenation-plus-MLP associationKITTI validation, Car · AP3D@IoU=0.7 moderate57.32 -> 57.45HelpedFD3D: Exploiting Foreground Depth Map for Feature-Supervised Monocular 3D Object Detection (AAAI 2024 · 17 citations)
Replace the naive raw pseudo-LiDAR and tight-box pipeline with the proposed pseudo-LiDAR and box refinementKITTI · AP7.3 -> 18.5HelpedTraining an Open-Vocabulary Monocular 3D Detection Model without 3D Data (NeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations)
Add the Completion Network to NOQG + DAMKITTI 3D val, Moderate · AP3D15.71 -> 20.90HelpedMonoMAE: Enhancing Monocular 3D Detection through Depth-Aware Masked Autoencoders (NeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations)
Add Dice loss to BEV segmentationKITTI-360 Val · AP3D50 APLrg (%)4.86 -> 8.71HelpedSeaBird: Segmentation in Bird's View with Dice Loss Improves Monocular 3D Detection of Large Objects (CVPR 2024 · 9 citations)
add intrinsic parameter unificationnuScenes→KITTI · AP40 3D, Moderate5.27 -> 16.94HelpedGeometry-Guided Domain Generalization for Monocular 3D Object Detection (AAAI 2024 · 7 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
MonoDETRKITTI test, carAP3D Hard12.99 – 13.953 papers, e.g. CVPR 2023 and CVPR 2024
MonoDETRKITTI test, carAP3D Easy23.65 – 253 papers, e.g. CVPR 2023 and CVPR 2024

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 11 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • KITTI · 7 of 11 papers
  • nuScenes · 7 of 11 papers
  • Omni3D · 2 of 11 papers
  • SUN-RGBD · 2 of 11 papers
  • ARKitScenes · 2 of 11 papers

Baselines

  • GUPNet · 5 of 11 papers
  • MonoDTR · 4 of 11 papers
  • Cube R-CNN · 4 of 11 papers
  • MonoDETR · 4 of 11 papers
  • MonoDLE · 3 of 11 papers
  • MonoJSG · 3 of 11 papers
  • CaDDN · 3 of 11 papers
  • DID-M3D · 3 of 11 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 24 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy