AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Continual learning / Online and replay-based

Plasticity-preserving continual reinforcement learning

Keeps policies adaptable using architectural design, policy subspaces and composition across tasks.

43 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Online and replay-based, keyword cluster “weight · transfer · growing”

State History Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

8 papers in 2023–24 and 27 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 4.9% to 13.7%.

Open questions the data points to

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 1182019: 1192020: 0202021: 2212022: 3222023: 4232024: 4242025: 7252026: 2026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

21 papers here report 227 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 23%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add diagonal layers to Parseval regularizationMetaworld sequences · performanceHelpedParseval Regularization for Continual Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Greedy-selection search instead of open-ended exploration for memory design learningALFWorld, GPT-5-nano and GPT-5-mini testing · success rate11.9 vs 12.4 (nano); 77.1 vs 87.1 (mini)HurtLearning to Continually Learn via Meta-learning Agentic Memory Designs (NeurIPS 2026 · 0 citations)
Remove Synthetic Experience RehearsalCheetah and MiniGrid transfer tasks · average rewardHurtKnowledge Retention in Continual Model-Based Reinforcement Learning (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use the orthogonal churn-reduction gradient component onlyProcGen Starpilot and Chaser · episode returnHelpedMitigating Plasticity Loss in Continual Reinforcement Learning by Reducing Churn (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
replace vector quantization with an auto-encoderD4RL continual learning · normalized scoreHurtTackling Continual Offline RL through Selective Weights Activation on Aligned Spaces (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
add adaptive weighting of historical knowledge vectorsFreeway · PERF.0.7532 → 0.7821HelpedContinual Knowledge Adaptation for Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
add feature distillation (KD)HM3D and MP3D · average SR22% and 16%HelpedC-NAV: Towards Self-Evolving Continual Object Navigation in Open World (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use context-aware composition rather than fixed compositionDMC Walker continual policy shift · performanceHelpedSkill Expansion and Composition in Parameter Space (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
EWCCW20forward transfer-0.17 – -0.152 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2021 and NeurIPS 2022
PackNetCW20forward transfer0.18 – 0.192 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2022 and NeurIPS 2021
Fine-tuningCW20forward transfer0.19 – 0.22 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2022 and NeurIPS 2021

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 12 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • D4RL · 2 of 12 papers

Baselines

  • EWC · 2 of 12 papers
  • PackNet · 2 of 12 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 35 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 32 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy