AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Continual learning / Online and replay-based

Unified and unsupervised continual frameworks

Proposes general frameworks, benchmarks and architecture-growing methods for task-agnostic and unsupervised continual learning.

120 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2018–2026) · an approach in Online and replay-based, keyword cluster “weight · transfer · growing”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

38 papers in 2023–24 and 42 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 23.3% to 21.3%.

No longer reported by papers here: Split CIFAR-100 (accuracy, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 1182019: 5192020: 12202021: 10212022: 12222023: 23232024: 15242025: 16252026: 2626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

Split CIFAR-100 · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2020–2024 · not reported since 2024

2020: 20.12022: 82.3
20202024
YearBest so farSet by
202020.1A Neural Dirichlet Process Mixture Model for Task-Free Continual Learning (ICLR 2020 · 109 citations)
202282.3Representational Continuity for Unsupervised Continual Learning (ICLR 2022 · 28 citations)

What has been tried

90 papers here report 909 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 70%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 18%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use AUGD instead of no MOOFewRel, T10 · mean overall accuracy83.3 -> 84.8HelpedContinual Relation Extraction via Sequential Multi-Task Learning (AAAI 2024 · 16 citations)
Add importance sampling to the prototype-based contrastive loss without PRDSeq-Cifar-10 Class-IL, buffer 200 · accuracy56.43±1.54 -> 58.37± 1.17HelpedContrastive Continual Learning with Importance Sampling and Prototype-Instance Relation Distillation (AAAI 2024 · 14 citations)
add DSGDCIFAR100-5, CIFAR100-20, CIFAR100-80 · average accuracy31.79 -> 35.91; 45.75 -> 48.44; 53.46 -> 54.40HelpedDynamic Sub-graph Distillation for Robust Semi-supervised Continual Learning (AAAI 2024 · 12 citations)
Add FML instead of BCEEMBER, 11 tasks · mean accuracy52.1 -> 54.5HelpedMalCL: Leveraging GAN-Based Generative Replay to Combat Catastrophic Forgetting in Malware Classification (AAAI 2025 · 9 citations)
Remove replay memoryTinyImagenet · capacity93.6% -> 32.15%HelpedTinySubNets: An Efficient and Low Capacity Continual Learning Strategy (AAAI 2025 · 6 citations)
add Tail AnchorCIFAR-100, Task 5 · accuracy (%)72.3 -> 89.4HelpedHandling Spatial-Temporal Data Heterogeneity for Federated Continual Learning via Tail Anchor (CVPR 2025 · 6 citations)
Add reliable weight consolidation during tuningCIFAR-100 · OOD detection AUROC71.97 -> 82.24HelpedRCL: Reliable Continual Learning for Unified Failure Detection (CVPR 2024 · 6 citations)
Select random, highest-attention, and lowest-attention patches rather than only highest-attention patchesCamelyon-TCGA · AACC0.595±0.121 -> 0.729±0.041HelpedAdvancing Multiple Instance Learning with Continual Learning for Whole Slide Imaging (CVPR 2025 · 5 citations)
replace KAC spline functions with a trainable MLPImageNet-R, 20 steps · Avg83.59 -> 80.56HurtKAC: Kolmogorov-Arnold Classifier for Continual Learning (CVPR 2025 · 5 citations)
Decrease the expansion threshold γSplit CIFAR10 · accuracyNo clear effectTask-Free Dynamic Sparse Vision Transformer for Continual Learning (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Set unlearning rate gamma to 0.02, 0.03, or 0.04CIFAR-100, CIFAR-10, and Tiny-ImageNet Task-IL · accuracyCIFAR100: 77.23 ± 0.97; 77.71 ± 0.85; 77.08 ± 0.90. CIFAR10: 94.27 ± 0.42; 94.64 ± 0.38; 94.82 ± 0.51. Tiny-ImageNet: 53MixedA Unified and General Framework for Continual Learning (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)
Set λ=0.2 instead of λ=0.8CIFAR10, α=0.1 · test accuracy39.93 -> 42.58HelpedFedSSI: Rehearsal-Free Continual Federated Learning with Synergistic Synaptic Intelligence (ICML 2025 · 2 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 20 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-100 · 7 of 20 papers
  • Tiny-ImageNet · 6 of 20 papers
  • ImageNet-R · 4 of 20 papers
  • CIFAR10 · 3 of 20 papers
  • Permuted MNIST · 2 of 20 papers
  • split CIFAR100 · 2 of 20 papers
  • Imagenet100 · 2 of 20 papers
  • CUB200 · 2 of 20 papers

Baselines

  • EWC · 7 of 20 papers
  • ER · 5 of 20 papers
  • LwF · 5 of 20 papers
  • DER++ · 4 of 20 papers
  • Fine-tuning · 4 of 20 papers
  • SI · 3 of 20 papers
  • PackNet · 3 of 20 papers
  • FedAvg · 3 of 20 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 80 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy