AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / CNN design

Efficient CNN scaling and dynamic inference

Scales and compresses CNNs with compound scaling, dynamic spatial computation, and channel-wise convolutions.

104 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in CNN design, keyword cluster “convolution · kernel · spatial”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

13 papers in 2023–24 and 4 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 9.5% to 3.9%.

No longer reported by papers here: ImageNet (Top-1 accuracy, last in 2022); CIFAR-10 (accuracy, last in 2020); CIFAR-100 (accuracy, last in 2022); CIFAR-10 (top-1 accuracy (%), last in 2023); ImageNet-1K val (top-1 accuracy, last in 2024); ImageNet-1k (Top-1 accuracy, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 7162017: 9172018: 21182019: 16192020: 17202021: 9212022: 8222023: 8232024: 5242025: 2252026: 226

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

ImageNet · Top-1 accuracy (higher is better)

9 papers, 2018–2022 · not reported since 2022

2018: 72.22019: 76.52021: 82.7
20182022

CIFAR-10 · accuracy (higher is better)

8 papers, 2016–2020 · not reported since 2020

2016: 92.182017: 95.4
20162020
YearBest so farSet by
201692.18Deep SimNets (CVPR 2016 · 21 citations)
201795.4Building a Regular Decision Boundary With Deep Networks (CVPR 2017 · 17 citations)

CIFAR-100 · accuracy (higher is better)

8 papers, 2017–2022 · not reported since 2022

2017: 79.62019: 91.7
20172022
YearBest so farSet by
201779.6Building a Regular Decision Boundary With Deep Networks (CVPR 2017 · 17 citations)
201991.7EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks (ICML 2019 · 4,992 citations)

CIFAR-10 · top-1 accuracy (%) (higher is better)

5 papers, 2019–2023 · not reported since 2023

2019: 98
20192023
YearBest so farSet by
201998Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better? (CVPR 2019 · 1,284 citations)

ImageNet-1K val · top-1 accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2024 · not reported since 2024

2021: 792022: 82.32023: 88.9
20212024
YearBest so farSet by
202179Dynamic Resolution Network (NeurIPS 2021 · 1 citation)
202282.3Bridging the Gap Between Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks on Small Datasets (NeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations)
202388.9ConvNeXt V2: Co-Designing and Scaling ConvNets With Masked Autoencoders (CVPR 2023 · 1,589 citations)

ImageNet-1k · Top-1 accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2020–2024 · not reported since 2024

2020: 60.92021: 78.652022: 79.92024: 85.24
20202024

What has been tried

98 papers here report 1,081 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 70%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 19%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add the horizontal band-kernel branchImageNet-1K val · top-1 accuracy81.9 -> 82.3HelpedInceptionNeXt: When Inception Meets ConvNeXt (CVPR 2024 · 401 citations)
add the information-compression penalty loss during warm-upNTU120-Xset · top-1 accuracyHelpedAre Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolution Networks for Human Action Recognition Over-Parameterized? (CVPR 2025 · 13 citations)
replace clustering with convolutionKodak · coding performanceHurtAnother Way to the Top: Exploit Contextual Clustering in Learned Image Coding (AAAI 2024 · 11 citations)
PiX with zeta=8 squeezing on ResNet-50ImageNet · Top-1 accuracy+0.81% over zeta=8 baseline with ~56% fewer FLOPsHelpedPick-or-Mix: Dynamic Channel Sampling for ConvNets (CVPR 2024 · 2 citations)
Use an asymmetric rather than symmetric distribution of convolution and transformer blocksImageNet-1K · top-1 accuracy82.8% -> 83.4%HelpedAsCAN: Asymmetric Convolution-Attention Networks for Efficient Recognition and Generation (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Global Average Pooling vs. global max poolingAtari 20 games · performanceHelpedMind the GAP! The Challenges of Scale in Pixel-based Deep Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 7 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ImageNet-1K · 2 of 7 papers
  • ADE20K · 2 of 7 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 17 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 29 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy