AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / CNN design

Theory of convolutional inductive bias

Analyzes invariance, stability, and Lipschitz properties of convolutional layers and pooling geometry.

64 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in CNN design, keyword cluster “cnn · filter · trained”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

12 papers in 2023–24 and 5 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.8% to 4.9%.

No longer reported by papers here: CIFAR-10 (accuracy, last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 7172018: 5182019: 4192020: 10202021: 11212022: 9222023: 9232024: 3242025: 2252026: 326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CIFAR-10 · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2020–2022 · not reported since 2022

2020: 95.03
20202022
YearBest so farSet by
202095.03Kernel Based Progressive Distillation for Adder Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2020 · 30 citations)

What has been tried

55 papers here report 519 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 61%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 22%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use partial streaming for only the first three convolutional layersPPGDalia · MAE (BPM)4.42 -> 3.77HelpedDon’t Think It Twice: Exploit Shift Invariance for Efficient Online Streaming Inference of CNNs (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 6 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 2 of 6 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 28 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy