AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / CNN design

Compact CNN architectures

Condenses and refines convolutional networks via binary structure, learned shapes, and PDE views.

114 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in CNN design, keyword cluster “cnn · filter · trained”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

18 papers in 2023–24 and 2 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 13.1% to 2.0%.

No longer reported by papers here: CIFAR-10 (accuracy, last in 2024); CIFAR-100 (accuracy, last in 2024); ImageNet (top-1 accuracy (%), last in 2021); ImageNet validation (top-1 accuracy, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 7162017: 13172018: 14182019: 10192020: 18202021: 21212022: 11222023: 11232024: 7242025: 1252026: 126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CIFAR-10 · accuracy (higher is better)

13 papers, 2017–2024 · not reported since 2024

2017: 95.012021: 99.5
20172024
YearBest so farSet by
201795.01Deep Hyperspherical Learning (NeurIPS 2017 · 79 citations)
202199.5An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale (ICLR 2021 · 21,812 citations)

CIFAR-100 · accuracy (higher is better)

12 papers, 2017–2024 · not reported since 2024

2017: 76.392021: 94.55
20172024
YearBest so farSet by
201776.39Deep Hyperspherical Learning (NeurIPS 2017 · 79 citations)
202194.55An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale (ICLR 2021 · 21,812 citations)

ImageNet · top-1 accuracy (%) (higher is better)

5 papers, 2018–2021 · not reported since 2021

2018: 64.32019: 71.52020: 74.9
20182021
YearBest so farSet by
201864.3From Hashing to CNNs: Training Binary Weight Networks via Hashing (AAAI 2018 · 78 citations)
201971.5In-Place Zero-Space Memory Protection for CNN (NeurIPS 2019 · 0 citations)
202074.9AdderNet: Do We Really Need Multiplications in Deep Learning? (CVPR 2020 · 195 citations)

ImageNet validation · top-1 accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2018–2024 · not reported since 2024

2018: 82.52
20182024
YearBest so farSet by
201882.52DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networks (NeurIPS 2018 · 509 citations)

What has been tried

105 papers here report 1,125 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 65%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 22%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add structural re-parameterization multi-branch topology during trainingImageNet-1K · Top-1 accuracy78.47% -> 78.74%HelpedRepViT: Revisiting Mobile CNN From ViT Perspective (CVPR 2024 · 30 citations)
Add the supplement gate to LFMUsImageNet100 · Top-1 accuracy78.40% -> 78.94%; 78.02% -> 78.66%; 79.88% -> 80.58%; 79.36% -> 81.22%; 78.34% -> 79.36%; 78.52% -> 79.98%; 78.96% -> 80HelpedMultiscale Low-Frequency Memory Network for Improved Feature Extraction in Convolutional Neural Networks (AAAI 2024 · 6 citations)
set B to 2 rather than 1 during B-cosificationImageNet validation · GridPG localisation33.9{ ±0.2} -> 87.6{ ±0.2}HelpedB-cosification: Transforming Deep Neural Networks to be Inherently Interpretable (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Add gain-bias augmentation (maximum variation ±10%)CIFAR-10 D_S · accuracy38.1 -> 76.9HelpedNormalize Filters! Classical Wisdom for Deep Vision (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Replace the SPD MLR layer with MLR in structure spacesHDM05 · accuracy79.78 ± 1.42 -> 78.52 ± 1.34HurtMatrix Manifold Neural Networks++ (ICLR 2024)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ImageNet-1K · 3 of 8 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 8 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 20 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 29 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy