AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / CNN design

CNN filter pruning

Prunes or factorizes convolutional filters using frequency-domain, gating, and redundancy criteria.

43 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2025) · an approach in CNN design, keyword cluster “cnn · filter · trained”

State History Benchmarks Tried Preprints Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

2 papers in 2023–24 and 1 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 1.5% to 1.0%.

No longer reported by papers here: ImageNet (Top-1 accuracy, last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 3172018: 11182019: 8192020: 6202021: 6212022: 3222023: 0232024: 2242025: 1252026: 026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

ImageNet · Top-1 accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2018–2022 · not reported since 2022

2018: 56.822019: 77.47
20182022
YearBest so farSet by
201856.82Frequency-Domain Dynamic Pruning for Convolutional Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2018 · 99 citations)
201977.47Approximated Oracle Filter Pruning for Destructive CNN Width Optimization (ICML 2019 · 45 citations)

What has been tried

42 papers here report 442 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 24%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Replace Ward linkage with single linkageCIFAR-10, ResNet-56 · Top-1 accuracy93.40% -> 92.74%HurtREPrune: Channel Pruning via Kernel Representative Selection (AAAI 2024 · 6 citations)
replace default quantization with Lo-Hi sensitive quantizationJPEG · BD-rate over LPIPS-11.50%HelpedFrequency-Biased Synergistic Design for Image Compression and Compensation (CVPR 2025 · 4 citations)
add dyadic decomposition front-endNorthEastUS · MSE1.35 -> 1.05HelpedSoundCount: Sound Counting from Raw Audio with Dyadic Decomposition Neural Network (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 23 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy