atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / CNN design

Multiscale Low-Frequency Memory Network for Improved Feature Extraction in Convolutional Neural Networks

AAAI 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › CNN design · approach: Compact CNN architectures · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes the Multiscale Low-Frequency Memory (MLFM) network, a plug-and-play parallel memory branch of wavelet-based Low-Frequency Memory Units that improves CNN classification on ImageNet and segmentation on Cityscapes.

Problem

CNNs discard low-frequency information as depth increases (favoring high-frequency texture and edge responses), which hurts tasks needing global structure or smooth transitions.

Approach

A parallel low-frequency memory branch of LFMUs, each with input, update, supplement, forget, and output gates, that stores multiscale wavelet low-frequency coefficients and exchanges them with the core CNN at each downsampling node without changing the core architecture.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add MLFM at L1-L5 to ResNet18ResNet18 · ImageNet100Top-1 accuracy: 77.86% -> 81.22%Helped
Add MLFM to InceptionNeXtInceptionNeXt · ImageNet100Accuracy: 87.58% -> 88.06%Helped
Add MLFM at L1-L5 using Haar waveletsResNet18 and ResNet34 · ImageNet1000Accuracy: 69.79% -> 71.32%; 73.09% -> 74.66%Helped
Add LFMU to the UNet encoderUNet · CityscapesMIoU: 66.25% -> 67.29%Helped
Add LFMU to the UNet encoder and decoderUNet · CityscapesMIoU: 66.25% -> 68.32%Helped
Add LFMU to the FCN encoderFCN_ResNet · CityscapesMIoU: 64.32% -> 65.27%Helped
Add LFMU to the FCN encoder and decoderFCN_ResNet · CityscapesMIoU: 64.32% -> 67.43%Helped
Add the supplement gate to LFMUs (ablation)ResNet18 with LFMU placements L1-L2 through L4-L5 · ImageNet100Top-1 accuracy: 78.40% -> 78.94%; 78.02% -> 78.66%; 79.88% -> 80.58%; 79.36% -> 81.22%; 78.34% -> 79.36%; 78.52% -> 79.98%; 78.96% -> 80Helped
Use wavelet decomposition instead of max-pooling or average pooling (ablation)ResNet18 LFMU forget and supplement gates · ImageNet100Top-1 accuracy: 77.64% -> 81.22%; 77.68% -> 81.22%Helped
Vary LFMU placement across network stages (ablation)ResNet18 · ImageNet100Top-1 accuracy: 77.86% baseline; 78.16%–81.22%Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet100 ImageNet-1K Cityscapes

Benchmarks: ImageNet100 ImageNet-1K Cityscapes

Metrics: Top-1 accuracy Top-5 accuracy error rate mIoU overall accuracy precision recall

Baselines: ResNet MobileNetV2 SENet RegNet EfficientNet ConvNeXt InceptionNeXt FCN U-Net

Builds on: Feature Pyramid Network wavelet pooling ResNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy