AI Paper Atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Depth and stereo

Depth from light field and defocus

Estimates depth using light fields, defocus, event cues and interference instead of standard RGB.

60 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Depth and stereo, keyword cluster “depth estimation · monocular · depth map”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

15 papers in 2023–24 and 27 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 4.9% to 6.6%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 2172018: 3182019: 1192020: 3202021: 2212022: 6222023: 9232024: 6242025: 12252026: 1526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

42 papers here report 377 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 76%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 16%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add low-cost LiDAR promptingARKitScenes · L10.0605 -> 0.0138HelpedPrompting Depth Anything for 4K Resolution Accurate Metric Depth Estimation (CVPR 2025 · 29 citations)
use PPFT with polarization guidance instead of RGB guidanceHAMMER All sensors · RMSE33.06 -> 28.63HelpedRobust Depth Enhancement via Polarization Prompt Fusion Tuning (CVPR 2024 · 17 citations)
replace the graph-based Radar structure extractor with an MLPnuScenes, 0–70m · MAE1712.6 -> 1815.6HurtTacoDepth: Towards Efficient Radar-Camera Depth Estimation with One-stage Fusion (CVPR 2025 · 8 citations)
Add random depth augmentationNYUv2 sparsity bias · RMSE0.498 -> 0.231HelpedDepth Prompting for Sensor-Agnostic Depth Estimation (CVPR 2024 · 8 citations)
retain full RCCB image resolutionNight, LiDAR ground-truth points · MAE2.04 -> 2.03No clear effectCross-spectral Gated-RGB Stereo Depth Estimation (CVPR 2024 · 7 citations)
Use patch size 11 × 11 instead of 21 × 21Synthetic testing set · RMSE (cm)5.281 -> 5.675HurtBlurry-Edges: Photon-Limited Depth Estimation from Defocused Boundaries (CVPR 2025 · 4 citations)
Add FGDECompressed-NYU · MAEHelpedDecoupling Fine Detail and Global Geometry for Compressed Depth Map Super-Resolution (CVPR 2025 · 4 citations)
Add SFE to LMMiToF test set · MAEd (cm)6.24 -> 5.83HelpediToF-flow-based High Frame Rate Depth Imaging (CVPR 2024 · 4 citations)
Add the proposed temporal representation alignment instead of unaligned E2VID reconstructioninterlaken_00_c (DSEC) · EPE43.02 -> 1.49HelpedZero-Shot Event-Intensity Asymmetric Stereo via Visual Prompting from Image Domain (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
add Smoothness Loss with Highlight Removal (LS)C3VD · AbsRel0.082 -> 0.076HelpedUnsupervised Photometric-Consistent Depth Estimation from Endoscopic Monocular Video (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
add photometric reprojection lossUIEB_dark · PSNR16.33 -> 17.21HelpedSea-ing in Low-light (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
add spatial and focal variational constraintsNYU Depth v2 · RMSE0.094 -> 0.075HelpedDualFocus: Depth from Focus with Spatio-Focal Dual Variational Constraints (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 13 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ARKitScenes · 2 of 13 papers
  • nuScenes · 2 of 13 papers
  • ZJU-4DRadarCam · 2 of 13 papers

Baselines

  • Depth Anything · 3 of 13 papers
  • Depth Anything V2 · 3 of 13 papers
  • Marigold · 3 of 13 papers
  • DefocusNet · 2 of 13 papers
  • ZoeDepth · 2 of 13 papers
  • DepthPro · 2 of 13 papers
  • Lin et al. · 2 of 13 papers
  • RC-PDA · 2 of 13 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 42 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy