atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Depth and stereo

A Multi-View Stereo Benchmark With High-Resolution Images and Multi-Camera Videos

CVPR 2017 · 3D vision › Depth and stereo · approach: Cost-volume multi-view stereo · 913 citations (OpenAlex)

Check your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use COLMAP instead of the other evaluated MVS methodsETH3D MVS benchmarks · ETH3D high-resolution and mobile MVSF1 score: 65.2; 64.1; 51.8; 69.7Helped
Evaluate methods on diverse scenes rather than only Strecha scenesMVS methods · Strecha and ETH3D MVS benchmarksF1 score: COLMAP 75.9 -> 64.7; CMPMVS 78.2 -> 48.9Mixed
Use video sequences with high view redundancyPMVS, Gipuma, and CMPMVS · ETH3D low-resolution multi-view videoreconstruction accuracy and completenessHurt
Use MC-CNN on the ETH3D stereo benchmark instead of established stereo benchmarksMC-CNN · ETH3D, Middlebury, and KITTI stereobad 2 ranking: 4 (8.9); 1 (10.1); 1 (3.9)Mixed
Use the proposed image-to-laser-scan alignment refinement rather than initial alignment or 7-DoF ICPImage and laser-scan registration · ETH3D registration examplesalignment qualityHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy