atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning from Low Quality Data

NeurIPS 2024 · Reinforcement learning › Visual and representation RL · approach: Probabilistic and autonomous RL · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows zero-shot RL methods (forward-backward representations) overestimate OOD action values on small low-quality datasets and proposes conservative regularisers (VC-FB, MC-FB) that match or beat FB and even task-aware CQL on ExORL.

Problem

Zero-shot RL methods based on successor measures and successor features need large heterogeneous pre-training datasets; their performance collapses when pre-trained on small, low-quality, homogeneous offline datasets due to OOD value overestimation.

Approach

Re-purpose CQL-style conservatism for zero-shot RL by penalising OOD action values (VC-FB) or OOD successor measures (MC-FB) across task vectors sampled from the task distribution, without introducing new parametric functions, with the penalty weight tuned via Lagrangian dual gradient descent.</ېcore_idea>

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add value-conservative regularizationFB · ExORL all datasets, domains and tasks (100k transitions)Aggregated performance: 99 -> 148Helped
Add measure-conservative regularizationFB · ExORL all datasets, domains and tasks (100k transitions)Aggregated performance: 99 -> 136Helped
Use backward-model embeddings for all conservative-update task vectors (ablation)VC-FB · ExORL all datasets, domains and tasks (100k transitions)Aggregated performance: 148 -> 108Hurt
Add value-conservative regularizationFB · ExORL all datasets, domains and tasks (full datasets)IQM score: 256 -> 267Helped
Add measure-conservative regularizationFB · ExORL all datasets, domains and tasks (full datasets)IQM score: 256 -> 271Helped
Add value-conservative regularizationFB · ExORL Random, all domains and tasks (full dataset)IQM score: 111 -> 131Helped
Add measure-conservative regularizationFB · ExORL Random, all domains and tasks (full dataset)IQM score: 111 -> 133Helped
Add value-conservative regularizationFB · ExORL aggregate across datasets, domains and tasksIQM performance relative to FB: 150%Helped
Add measure-conservative regularizationFB · ExORL aggregate across datasets, domains and tasksIQM performance relative to FB: 150%Helped
Add value-conservative regularizationFB · D4RL aggregate across domains and datasetsPerformance relative to FB: 6.8 timesHelped
Add measure-conservative regularizationFB · D4RL aggregate across domains and datasetsPerformance relative to FB: 5.6 timesHelped
Increase the Rnd dataset sizeFB, VC-FB and MC-FB · ExORL aggregate across domainsIQM performance gap between conservative variants and FBHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ExORL D4RL

Benchmarks: ExORL D4RL

Metrics: IQM of task score normalised score vs CQL performance profiles

Baselines: FB SF-LAP GC-IQL CQL offline TD3 DVC-FB

Builds on: forward-backward representations universal successor features conservative q-learning ExORL D4RL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy