atlas

Research map / Optimization / Optimizers

Learning Bayesian Nash Equilibrium in Auction Games via Approximate Best Response

ICML 2025 · Optimization › Optimizers · approach: Randomized gradient estimation

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Approximate Best Response Gradient, which pairs an analytic utility-gradient estimator with a Best Response Distance objective to learn BNE in auctions with convergence independent of bidder count.

Problem

Learning Bayesian Nash Equilibrium strategies in continuous single-item auctions becomes slow to converge as the number of bidders grows, and gradient estimates of the non-smooth utility are biased.

Approach

Derives an analytic gradient of ex-interim utility (estimated via Monte Carlo on price distributions) and replaces the utility objective with a Best Response Distance objective, optimized using a locally approximated best response (second-order Newton-like or first-order step) to avoid arg-max computation.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use Approx BR instead of SMBNE learning · First-price auction, symmetric, n=10L2 distance to BNE @2k steps: 5.01e-2 -> 9.65e-3Helped
Use Approx BR instead of Utility GradBNE learning · First-price auction, symmetric, n=10L2 distance to BNE @2k steps: 5.44e-2 -> 9.65e-3Helped
Use Approx BR instead of SMBNE learning · Second-price auction, symmetric, n=10L2 distance to BNE @2k steps: 3.51e-2 -> 3.73e-3Helped
Use Approx BR instead of Utility GradBNE learning · Second-price auction, symmetric, n=10L2 distance to BNE @2k steps: 3.17e-2 -> 3.73e-3Helped
Use Approx BR instead of SMBNE learning · Second-price auction, symmetric, n=2L2 distance to BNE @2k steps: 3.57e-3 -> 3.77e-3No clear effect
Apply Approx BR gradient after 200 steps using SM gradient estimationSM BNE learning · First-price auction, symmetric, n=10L2 distance to BNE: approximately 7e-2 -> approximately 5e-3Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic auction value priors (uniform, asymmetric, risk-averse)

Benchmarks: symmetric first-price and second-price auctions with known BNE asymmetric auctions risk-averse auctions

Metrics: L2 distance to BNE strategy time per iteration

Baselines: SM (Smooth Market) Utility Grad REINFORCE Evolution Strategies

Builds on: Smooth Market Bichler et al. 2021 neural pseudo-gradient learning equilibrium-aware loss

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy