atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Submodular and game algorithms

Increasing Revenue in Efficient Combinatorial Auctions by Learning to Generate Artificial Competition

AAAI 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Submodular and game algorithms · approach: Learned auction design · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces f-VCG auctions that inject artificial competitors into efficient combinatorial auctions to boost revenue under a relaxed (pi, kappa)-IR model, deriving revenue-optimal designs under distributional and quantile knowledge and sample-efficient learning algorithms from bidder data.

Problem

Efficient (welfare-maximizing) combinatorial auctions such as VCG generate very low revenue; the paper asks how an auctioneer can add competition to raise revenue while keeping efficiency, incentive compatibility, and a relaxed individual rationality.

Approach

A new f-VCG auction family prices each bidder against an auctioneer-specified artificial competitor that may depend on other bidders' bids; under a bidder model allowing small overcharges accepted with some probability, the paper derives revenue-optimal efficient designs and instance-adaptive learning algorithms.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use an f-VCG auction with artificial competitors under (π, κ)-IR instead of requiring standard IREfficient combinatorial auctions with known bidder value distributions · Bidder value distributionsrevenueHelped
Choose artificial competitors using bidder value quantilesEfficient f-VCG auctions · Bidder value quantilesrevenueHelped
Learn instance-adaptive competitors from historical bidder dataf-VCG auctions with acceptable overcharges · Historical bidder datarevenueHelped
Allow overcharges while requiring bidders to accept themEfficient f-VCG auctions · Bidders who do not accept overchargesefficiencyMixed
Use the Bayesian weakest-competitor auction rather than a competitor chosen after seeing other bidders' bidsTwo-bidder, two-item example · Example 3.5overcharge probability: 50%Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: revenue efficiency overcharge frequency

Baselines: VCG WCVCG Bayesian WCVCG

Builds on: VCG auction weakest-competitor VCG Bayesian weakest-competitor VCG (Krishna and Perry 1998) data-driven auction design

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy