atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

EfficientZero V2: Mastering Discrete and Continuous Control with Limited Data

ICML 2024 · Reinforcement learning › Visual and representation RL · approach: Latent-space world models · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Extends EfficientZero to continuous and discrete control, visual and proprioceptive inputs, using sampling-based Gumbel tree search and search-based value estimation with a mixed value target, outperforming DreamerV3 and other SOTA in sample-limited benchmarks.

Problem

Sample-efficient RL that performs consistently well across discrete and continuous action spaces and both visual and low-dimensional inputs; prior methods (MCTS-based EfficientZero, TD-MPC, DreamerV3) each lack consistent performance across domains.

Approach

Replace MCTS with a sampling-based Gumbel search that mixes actions from the current Gaussian policy and a flattened prior (guaranteeing policy improvement in continuous spaces), and use a mixed value target that switches between multi-step TD for fresh data/early training and search-based value estimation for stale transitions.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use EZ-V2 instead of BBFAtari 100k · Atari 100kNormed Mean: 2.247 -> 2.428Helped
use EZ-V2 instead of EfficientZeroAtari 100k · Atari 100kNormed Mean: 1.945 -> 2.428Helped
use EZ-V2 instead of TD-MPC2Proprio Control · Proprio Control 100kMean: 740.9 -> 723.2Hurt
use EZ-V2 instead of DreamerV3Vision Control · Vision Control 200kMean: 498.5 -> 726.1Helped
add the mixed value target instead of using multi-step TD (ablation)EZ-V2 · Proprio Control 50-100k: Acrobot Swingupscore: 256.7 -> 297.7Helped
add the mixed value target instead of using GAE (ablation)EZ-V2 · Proprio Control 50-100k: Acrobot Swingupscore: 275.1 -> 297.7Helped
use sampling-based Gumbel search instead of Sample MCTS (ablation)EZ-V2 · Proprio Control 50-100k: Acrobot Swingupscore: 248.1 -> 297.7Helped
add the mixed value target instead of using multi-step TD (ablation)EZ-V2 · Vision Control 100-200k: Acrobot Swingupscore: 186.3 -> 231.8Helped
add the mixed value target instead of using GAE (ablation)EZ-V2 · Vision Control 100-200k: Acrobot Swingupscore: 122.0 -> 231.8Helped
use sampling-based Gumbel search instead of Sample MCTS (ablation)EZ-V2 · Vision Control 100-200k: Acrobot Swingupscore: 73.9 -> 231.8Helped
add the mixed value target instead of using multi-step TD (ablation)EZ-V2 · Atari 100k: Asterixscore: 26023.1 -> 61810.0Helped
add the mixed value target instead of using GAE (ablation)EZ-V2 · Atari 100k: Asterixscore: 22816.7 -> 61810.0Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Atari 100k DeepMind Control Suite

Benchmarks: Atari 100k DMControl Proprio Control 50k DMControl Proprio Control 100k DMControl Vision Control 100k DMControl Vision Control 200k

Metrics: human-normalized mean score human-normalized median score episode return

Baselines: DreamerV3 TD-MPC2 EfficientZero BBF SAC DrQ-v2 CURL SPR Sample MCTS

Builds on: EfficientZero Gumbel MuZero Sampled MuZero MuZero SimSiam

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy