atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Variational and generative sampling

LEAPS: A discrete neural sampler via locally equivariant networks

ICML 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Variational and generative sampling · approach: Hamiltonian Monte Carlo · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes LEAPS, a discrete neural sampler that learns a CTMC rate matrix via a PINN-style objective with importance weights, using locally equivariant networks to make the proactive IS update cheap; evaluated on Ising and Potts models on a 15x15 lattice.

Problem

Sampling from discrete distributions known only up to normalization, where MCMC mixes slowly and AIS/SMC importance weights can have high variance; standard neural rate-matrix parameterizations make the importance-weight computation prohibitively expensive.

Approach

Learn a CTMC rate matrix that transports a base distribution to the target, with log-importance weights accumulated along the trajectory (Radon-Nikodym derivative of reverse-time CTMC). A "locally equivariant" parameterization of rates (flux from x to neighbor is negative of flux back) makes the weight update and PINN loss computable in one network forward pass, and a family of locally equivariant

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use LEAPS instead of AISIsing model at critical temperature · Ising model, critical temperatureESS at a similar ESS target: ~10^6 integration steps (AIS) vs. 100 integration steps (LEAPS)Helped
Use LEAPS instead of AISPotts model at critical temperature · Potts model, critical temperatureESS: ∼ 20% ESS in 100 integration steps; AIS has a lower ESS even for 10^6 integration stepsHelped
Use LEAPS instead of MCMC samplersIsing model · Ising model, DISCS benchmarkESSHelped
Use LEAPS instead of MCMC samplersPotts model · Potts model, DISCS benchmarkESSHelped
Increase LEC network depth (ablation)LEAPS on the simple Ising model · Ising model, L=15, J = 0.4, β = 0.7ESSHelped
Remove transport and use only annealed dynamics with marginal-preserving MCMC updates (ablation)LEAPS on the simple Ising model · Ising model, L=15, J = 0.4, β = 0.7magnetization histogram agreementHurt
Use deep LEC instead of LEA (ablation)LEAPS on the simple Ising model · Ising model, L=15, J = 0.4, β = 0.7performanceHelped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Ising model samples from target distribution (simulated) Potts model (DISCS benchmark setup)

Benchmarks: Ising model 15x15 lattice Potts model 15x15 lattice DISCS benchmark

Metrics: effective sample size magnetization histogram two-point correlation function

Baselines: annealed importance sampling Glauber dynamics DISCS MCMC samplers

Builds on: annealed importance sampling sequential Monte Carlo discrete diffusion models log-variance divergence

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy