AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Causal discovery

Testing Independence Between Linear Combinations for Causal Discovery

AAAI 2021 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Causal discovery · approach: Identifiability with hidden confounders · 15 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace KCIT-based residual independence testing with FRCIT's kurtosis-curve comparisonReCIT in PC causal discovery · real-world causal structuresF1: PCFRCIT achieves the best F1 score on almost all structuresHelped
Use FRCIT instead of ReCIT for residual independence testingReCIT · independence testing, sample size 2000elapsed time (s): 2.9821 -> 0.0970Helped
Use FRCIT instead of ReCITReCIT · independence testing, Case I and Case IIType I and Type II error ratesHelped
Use PCFRCIT rather than PCKCITPC causal discovery · random DAG causal skeleton and PDAGF1: about 0.007; about 0.014Helped
Increase the number of noise variablesFRCIT and ReCIT · Case II, dependent uncorrelated linear combinationsType II error rateHurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy