atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Causal discovery

Markov Equivalence and Consistency in Differentiable Structure Learning

NeurIPS 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Causal discovery · approach: Differentiable and score-based DAG learning · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that differentiable acyclicity-constrained likelihood scores with quasi-MCP regularization recover the sparsest DAG and, under faithfulness, the Markov equivalence class, and are scale-invariant for Gaussian models.

Problem

Continuous (differentiable) score-based DAG structure learning relies on strong identifiability assumptions and uses least squares loss, which is sensitive to data scale (varsortability); it is unclear which score guarantees recovery of the sparsest model or Markov equivalence class under nonidentif

Approach

Replace the least squares score with the negative log-likelihood regularized by a differentiable nonconvex quasi-MCP penalty (an approximation of the l0 penalty) under an acyclicity constraint; show global minimizers are minimal-edge I-maps (sparsest representations), hence in the Markov equivalence class under faithfulness, and that the Gaussian log-likelihood score is scale-invariant.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace least squares with log-likelihood plus MCPNOTEARS · Different graph typesSHDHelped
Replace least squares with log-likelihood plus MCPNOTEARS · Sparse graphs {ER1, SF1}SHDMixed
Standardize the input dataGOLEM · Simulated graph dataSHDHurt
Standardize the input dataNOTEARS · Simulated graph dataSHDHurt
Standardize the input dataDAGMA · Simulated graph dataSHDHurt
Standardize the input datalogll-notears-sample · Simulated graph dataSHDMixed
Standardize the input datalogll-notears-population · Simulated graph dataSHDMixed
Standardize the input datalogll-notears-sample · ER-2, 10 nodesSHDNo clear effect
Standardize the input datalogll-notears-population · ER-2, 10 nodesSHDNo clear effect
Standardize the input datalogll-notears-sample · ER-2, 50 nodesSHDHurt
Standardize the input datalogll-notears-population · ER-2, 50 nodesSHDHurt
Use MCP or SCAD instead of quasi-MCP (ablation)Regularized log-likelihood structure learning · Gaussian DAG modelsRecovery of minimal equivalence classNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic linear Gaussian DAGs (ER and SF graphs)

Benchmarks: synthetic ER and SF graphs with p=10,20,50,70,100

Metrics: structural Hamming distance between CPDAGs

Baselines: NOTEARS GOLEM DAGMA VarSort FGES PC

Builds on: NOTEARS MCP SCAD sparsest Markov representation

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy