AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Optimizers

Zeroth-order training methods

Trains models using gradient estimates from function queries, with convergence and learning-dynamics analysis.

23 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in Optimizers, keyword cluster “variational · sampling · inference”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

3 papers in 2023–24 and 14 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 1.2% to 4.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 1192020: 2202021: 1212022: 2222023: 1232024: 2242025: 7252026: 726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

12 papers here report 109 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 65%, no clear effect 12%, hurt 18%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Replace the standard second-moment estimate with the refined estimateQuadratic function · relative error of second-moment estimateHelpedRefining Adaptive Zeroth-Order Optimization at Ease (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Set beta to 1, removing the unbiased perturbation contributionMNIST, 2-layer MLP · training lossHurtImproving the Straight-Through Estimator with Zeroth-Order Information (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Reduce the estimator from P4 to P3 using random selection between estimator pathwaysVariance analysis · varianceHurtOn the Optimal Construction of Unbiased Gradient Estimators for Zeroth-Order Optimization (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
add sampling momentumCIFAR10 test · test accuracy92.45 -> 93.41HelpedReLIZO: Sample Reusable Linear Interpolation-based Zeroth-order Optimization (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • SST-2 · 3 of 8 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 8 papers

Baselines

  • ZO-SGD · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 17 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 23 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy