AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Optimizers

SGD momentum and step-size schedules

Studies momentum, batch size, and step-size schedules for stochastic gradient descent.

72 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Optimizers, keyword cluster “adaptive · optimizers · momentum”

State History Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

8 papers in 2023–24 and 21 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 3.3% to 7.2%.

Open questions the data points to

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 2172018: 5182019: 10192020: 6202021: 7212022: 9222023: 3232024: 5242025: 8252026: 1326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

52 papers here report 461 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 58%, no clear effect 18%, hurt 17%, mixed 7%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use larger SVAG noise-scale multiplier ℓCIFAR-10, batch size B=512 · test performanceNo clear effectThe Marginal Value of Momentum for Small Learning Rate SGD (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
use NGN-M version 1 instead of version 2Diabetes quadratic · convergenceHelpedEnhancing Optimizer Stability: Momentum Adaptation of The NGN Step-size (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
use a nonzero gradient shift a instead of a=0quadratic problems with mini-batch noise · loss convergenceNo clear effectSGD with memory: fundamental properties and stochastic acceleration (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Update the learning rate every Φ>1 iterations (lazy update)Convergence (experiments across tasks) · convergenceNo clear effectGradient descent with generalized Newton’s method (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase AdamW beta1 above 0.9, including with a scheduler110M LLM training · performanceNo clear effectThe AdEMAMix Optimizer: Better, Faster, Older (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Move the MomDecSPS correcting factor 1−β outside the minimumExperiments reported in the paper · practical performanceHurtStochastic Polyak Step-sizes and Momentum: Convergence Guarantees and Practical Performance (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use increasing low-pass momentum instead of decreasing low-pass momentumCIFAR-100 · Top-1 accuracy69.69\textsubscript{0.75} -> 77.12\textsubscript{0.07}HelpedOn the Performance Analysis of Momentum Method: A Frequency Domain Perspective (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use lower bound 0 instead of an informative lower boundImageNet32 · validation accuracyNo clear effectMoMo: Momentum Models for Adaptive Learning Rates (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
AdamPenn Treebank LSTMtest perplexity57.83 – 66.672 papers, e.g. ICLR 2019 and ICML 2021

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 10 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR10 · 4 of 10 papers
  • CIFAR100 · 4 of 10 papers
  • ImageNet1k · 2 of 10 papers

Baselines

  • Adam · 3 of 10 papers
  • ALR-SMAG · 2 of 10 papers
  • AdamW · 2 of 10 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 29 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy