AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Optimizers

Second-order and structured preconditioning

Builds diagonal, full-matrix, and Hessian-based preconditioners for adaptive optimization.

70 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Optimizers, keyword cluster “adaptive · optimizers · momentum”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

16 papers in 2023–24 and 26 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 6.6% to 9.0%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 1172018: 6182019: 4192020: 4202021: 2212022: 8222023: 9232024: 7242025: 12252026: 1426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

51 papers here report 505 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 13%, hurt 17%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use momentum β=0.9 instead of β=0.98NanoGPT on OpenWebText · lossHurtThe Road Less Scheduled (NeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations)
add adaptive parameter-scaled perturbationsCIFAR100 · test accuracy83.21 -> 84.15; 79.11 -> 79.89; 82.65 -> 83.48MixedMomentum-SAM: Sharpness Aware Minimization without Computational Overhead (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
add gradient compensation to PID-controlled SGDCIFAR-100 · accuracy72.5% -> 74.7%HelpedA PID Controller Approach for Adaptive Probability-dependent Gradient Decay in Model Calibration (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Replace online gradient descent with AdaGrad for learning the preconditionerOptimization problems · convergence speedHelpedProvable and Practical Online Learning Rate Adaptation with Hypergradient Descent (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use Subspace-Momentum rank 32 instead of rank 64LLaMA 7B SFT, UltraFeedback · last validation perplexity2.584 -> 2.580HelpedLean and Mean Adaptive Optimization via Subset-Norm and Subspace-Momentum with Convergence Guarantees (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Cache eigendecomposition results for 100 steps rather than recomputing more frequentlyLLM-Init · time-to-Adam3.34 -> 0.74HelpedA Stable Whitening Optimizer for Efficient Neural Network Training (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use diagonal preconditioning (DASGO) instead of full-matrix ASGOGPT-2 pretraining · validation loss3.342 -> 3.509HurtASGO: Adaptive Structured Gradient Optimization (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use discounting (MagL-D) instead of the undiscounted MagLImage classification (time-varying corruption) · LCE_1000.09 -> 0.08HelpedDiscounted Adaptive Online Learning: Towards Better Regularization (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Vary η across the reported settingsCIFAR10 · top-1 accuracyHelpedRemove that Square Root: A New Efficient Scale-Invariant Version of AdaGrad (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
enable early stopping for the PG subproblem solverCIFAR10 validation · accuracy92.7 ± 0.2\% -> 92.9 ± 0.2\%No clear effectRegularized Adaptive Momentum Dual Averaging with an Efficient Inexact Subproblem Solver for Training Structured Neural Network (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 17 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ImageNet · 3 of 17 papers
  • CIFAR10 · 2 of 17 papers
  • CIFAR100 · 2 of 17 papers
  • OpenWebText · 2 of 17 papers
  • ImageNet-1k · 2 of 17 papers
  • mnist · 2 of 17 papers
  • FineWeb · 2 of 17 papers

Baselines

  • Adam · 7 of 17 papers
  • AdamW · 5 of 17 papers
  • Muon · 4 of 17 papers
  • Shampoo · 3 of 17 papers
  • AdaGrad · 2 of 17 papers
  • SGD · 2 of 17 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 42 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy