atlas

Research map / Optimization / Optimizers

The Marginal Value of Momentum for Small Learning Rate SGD

ICLR 2024 · Optimization › Optimizers · approach: SGD momentum and step-size schedules · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows theoretically that SGD with momentum (SGDM) and vanilla SGD with learning rate γ/(1-β) track each other in small-learning-rate, noise-dominated regimes, and empirically that momentum gives limited benefit on ImageNet, RoBERTa fine-tuning, and CIFAR-10 with SVAG.

Problem

Whether momentum provably helps stochastic gradient optimization in deep learning, where gradient noise dominates and learning rates are small; prior analyses found no provable acceleration of SGDM over SGD.

Approach

Uses weak approximation theory and an auxiliary coupled trajectory to show SGDM is weakly close to SGD (with averaged learning rate) over O(1/η) steps under noise scaling σ≤η^{-1/2}, and to share the same slow SDE on the manifold of minimizers over O(1/η²) steps; validates with ImageNet, RoBERTa fine-tuning, and SVAG-modified CIFAR-10 experiments.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add momentum (SGD to SGDM)RoBERTa-large fine-tuning · SST-2accuracy: 94.0 (0.4) -> 94.0 (0.5)No clear effect
Add momentum (SGD to SGDM)RoBERTa-large fine-tuning · SST-5accuracy: 55.2 (1.1) -> 55.0 (1.0)No clear effect
Add momentum (SGD to SGDM)RoBERTa-large fine-tuning · SNLIaccuracy: 87.7 (0.3) -> 88.4 (0.6)Mixed
Add momentum (SGD to SGDM)RoBERTa-large fine-tuning · TRECaccuracy: 97.2 (0.2) -> 97.2 (0.4)No clear effect
Add momentum (SGD to SGDM)RoBERTa-large fine-tuning · MNLIaccuracy: 84.0 (0.3) -> 83.7 (0.8)Mixed
Use larger SVAG noise-scale multiplier ℓ (ablation)SGD and SGDM on ResNet-32 · CIFAR-10, batch size B=512test performanceNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet CIFAR-10 SST-2 SST-5 SNLI TREC MNLI

Benchmarks: ImageNet CIFAR-10 SST-2 SST-5 SNLI TREC MNLI

Metrics: test accuracy

Baselines: SGD SGDM SVAG

Builds on: SVAG Linear Scaling Rule Li et al. 2021 slow SDE analysis of SGD Polyak heavy-ball momentum

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy